[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]



View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 24 from proof inv-write_inode (previous step)

err = ESUCCESS, inode0 = mkinode(m, md, true, dirs[m].nlink, dirs[m].nsubdirs, dirs[m].size), afs-cons(dirs[m, dirs[m].meta:= md], files), afs-cons(dirs, files), dcache-cons(dcache, dirs, files), icache-cons(icache, dirs, files), pcache-cons(pcache, dirs, files), synced(dirs, icache, pcache), m ∈ dirs, asynced2 → synced(files, icache, pcache) ⊦ ⟪asynced3 := false; if err = ESUCCESS then icache_get#(inode0.ino, icache; asynced3, inode1, err); if err = ESUCCESS ∧ asynced3 then {inode1.meta := inode0.meta; if ¬ inode0.directory then inode1.size := inode0.size; icache_set#(inode1, false; err, icache)} else if false then err := EFAIL⟫ ( icache-cons(icache, dirs[m, dirs[m].meta:= md], files) ∧ dcache-cons(dcache, dirs[m, dirs[m].meta:= md], files) ∧ pcache-cons(pcache, dirs[m, dirs[m].meta:= md], files) ∧ synced(dirs[m, dirs[m].meta:= md], icache, pcache) ∧ (asynced2 → synced(files, icache, pcache)))

Heuristic elimination applied rule insert elim lemma

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

spec: abstract-dir name: elim seq: ⊦ ( ((m = ad.size ∧ md = ad.meta) ∧ m0 = ad.nlink) ∧ m1 = ad.nsubdirs) ∧ entries = ad.entries ↔ ad = mkdir(m, md, m0, m1, entries) subst: [ad, m, md, m0, m1, entries] → [dirs[m], m0, md0, m1, m2, entries]

Additional information

Used simplifier rules: ⊦ ( ((m = ad.size ∧ md = ad.meta) ∧ m0 = ad.nlink) ∧ m1 = ad.nsubdirs) ∧ entries = ad.entries ↔ ad = mkdir(m, md, m0, m1, entries); (elim) Used terms: dirs[m], m0, md0, m1, m2, entries