[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]



View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 412 from proof inv-write_inode (previous step)

afs-cons(dirs, files), dcache-cons(dcache, dirs, files), icache-cons(icache, dirs, files), pcache-cons(pcache, dirs, files), synced(dirs, icache, pcache), asynced2 → synced(files, icache, pcache), m ∈ dirs ∧ m0 = dirs[m].nlink ∧ m2 = dirs[m].size ∧ m1 = dirs[m].nsubdirs ∧ boolvar ∨ m ∈ files ∧ m0 = files[m].nlink ∧ m1 = 0 ∧ ¬ boolvar, asynced2 ∨ boolvar ⊦ [choose err0 with ⌊err0⌋ in err := err0; asynced := ?] ⟪asynced0 := false; inode := mkinode(m, md, boolvar, m0, m1, m2); asynced3 := false; if err = ESUCCESS then icache_get#(inode.ino, icache; asynced3, inode1, err); if err = ESUCCESS ∧ asynced3 then {inode1.meta := inode.meta; if ¬ inode.directory then inode1.size := inode.size; icache_set#(inode1, asynced0; err, icache)} else if asynced0 then err := EFAIL⟫ (icache-cons(icache, dirs, files) ∧ synced(dirs, icache, pcache) ∧ (asynced2 → synced(files, icache, pcache)))

Heuristic symbolic execution applied rule choose right

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

Additional information