[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]

View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 124 from proof fsync-inode-overwrite (previous step)

asynced0 ↔ false, files0[m] = mkfile(m0, md0, m1, content), files = files0, ino = m, ino0 = m, inode = mkinode(m, md, false, m1, 0, m2), icache-cons(icache, dirs, files0), m ∈ files0 ⊦ [if err = ESUCCESS ∧ asynced0 ∧ asynced then afs_write_inode#(inode; err, dirs, files; asynced1); icache0 := icache; if err = ESUCCESS then {asynced := false; icache_set_status#(ino, asynced; err, icache)}] (err = ESUCCESS → files[inode.ino] = (files0 ⊕ icache0)[inode.ino]), ino0 ∈ icache

Heuristic symbolic execution applied rule if negative right

And obtained the following new goals

Proof step 125:
asynced0 ↔ false, files0[m] = mkfile(m0, md0, m1, content), files = files0, ino = m, ino0 = m, inode = mkinode(m, md, false, m1, 0, m2), icache-cons(icache, dirs, files0), m ∈ files0 ⊦ [skip; icache0 := icache; if err = ESUCCESS then {asynced := false; icache_set_status#(ino, asynced; err, icache)}] (err = ESUCCESS → files[inode.ino] = (files0 ⊕ icache0)[inode.ino]), ino0 ∈ icache

Rule argument

pos: right 1

Proof step 124 from proof fsync-inode-overwrite (previous step)

Heuristic symbolic execution applied rule if negative right

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

Additional information