[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]



View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 372 from proof refine-evict (previous step)

# links(m, cache_dirs) = 0, cache_pcache[datakey(ino, n)] = mkpentry(boolvar2, buf), cache_files[ino] = mkfile(m6, md2, # links(ino, cache_dirs), content1), cache_files[m] = mkfile(m0, md0, 0, content), cache_icache[ino] = mkientry(boolvar, mkinode(m2, md, false, m3, m4, m5)), (∅)[m] = mkientry(boolvar1, mkinode(m7, md3, boolvar0, m8, m9, m10)), evict(m, cache_pcache)[datakey(ino, n)] = mkpentry(boolvar3, buf0), afs-cons(cache_dirs, cache_files), afs-cons(cache_dirs, (cache_files ⊕ cache_pcache) ⊕ cache_icache), dcache-cons(cache_dcache, cache_dirs, cache_files), icache-cons(cache_icache, cache_dirs, cache_files), pcache-cons(cache_pcache, cache_dirs, cache_files), synced(cache_dirs, cache_icache, cache_pcache), datakey(ino, n) ∈ evict(m, cache_pcache), m ∈ cache_files, ino ∈ cache_files, ino ∈ cache_icache, datakey(ino, n) ∈ cache_pcache, cache_sync → synced(cache_files, cache_icache, cache_pcache), ∀ key. key ∈ cache_pcache → key.data? ⊦ buf = buf0, m = ROOT_INO, m ∈ cache_icache, m ∈ cache_dirs

User applied rule insert rewrite lemma

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

spec: pcache-del-ops name: in-evict-other seq: ⊦ ino ≠ ino0 → ( datakey(ino, pageno) ∈ evict(ino0, pcache) ↔ datakey(ino, pageno) ∈ pcache) subst: [pcache, ino0, pageno, ino] → [cache_pcache, m, n, ino] flags: <all paths>

Additional information

Used simplifier rules: ⊦ ino ≠ ino0 ∧ datakey(ino, pageno) ∈ pcache → evict(ino0, pcache)[datakey(ino, pageno)] = pcache[datakey(ino, pageno)]; (s)%⊦ mkpentry(boolvar, buf) = mkpentry(boolvar0, buf0) ↔ (boolvar ↔ boolvar0) ∧ buf = buf0; (ws) Used terms: cache_pcache, m, n, ino