[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]

View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 107 from proof inv-create (previous step)

replay-log(log0, fs1, fi ⊖ fo) = ri1 ⊖ ro, fs1[ri1[inodekey(m)]].directory, fs1[ri1[inodekey(m)]].inode?, fo.inodes?, ro.inodes?, file-node-cons(fs1, ri1), key-cons (key, (adr1 = (inodekey(m) = key ⊃ adr1;ri1[key]) ⊃ inodenode(inodekey(m), md0, true, fs1[ri1[inodekey(m)]].nlink, fs1[ri1[inodekey(m)]].nsubdirs, fs1[ri1[inodekey(m)]].size + 1) ;fs1[(inodekey(m) = key ⊃ adr1;ri1[key])] )), log-cons (log0, fs1[adr1, inodenode(inodekey(m), md0, true, fs1[ri1[inodekey(m)]].nlink, fs1[ri1[inodekey(m)]].nsubdirs, fs1[ri1[inodekey(m)]].size + 1)]), log-cons(log0, fs1), orphans-cons(fs1, ri1, ro), replay-cons-strong(fs1, ri1, ro, fi, fo, log0), replay-cons-strong (fs1[adr1, inodenode(inodekey(m), md0, true, fs1[ri1[inodekey(m)]].nlink, fs1[ri1[inodekey(m)]].nsubdirs, fs1[ri1[inodekey(m)]].size + 1)], ri1[inodekey(m), adr1], ro, fi, fo, log0 + adr1 '), replay-safe(log0, fs1, fi ⊖ fo), ri-cons (ri1[inodekey(m), adr1], fs1[adr1, inodenode(inodekey(m), md0, true, fs1[ri1[inodekey(m)]].nlink, fs1[ri1[inodekey(m)]].nsubdirs, fs1[ri1[inodekey(m)]].size + 1)]), ri-inj(fi), ri-inj(ri1), ubifs-cons(fs1, ri1, ro, fi, fo, log0), key ∈ ri1, ri1[inodekey(m)] ∈ fs1, inodekey(m) ∈ ri1, fs1[ri1[inodekey(m)]].nlink ≠ 0 ∨ m = ROOT_INO, (inodekey(m) = key ⊃ adr1;ri1[key]) = adr1 ∨ (inodekey(m) = key ⊃ adr1;ri1[key]) ∈ fs1 ⊦ adr1 = adr3, adr1 = adr2, adr2 = adr3, m = 0, n = 0, adr2 ∈ fs1, inodekey(m) ∈ ro, dentrykey(m, str) ∈ ri1, inodekey(n) ∈ fo, inodekey(n) ∈ ri1, adr1 ∈ fs1, adr3 ∈ fs1, replay-safe (log0, fs1[adr1, inodenode(inodekey(m), md0, true, fs1[ri1[inodekey(m)]].nlink, fs1[ri1[inodekey(m)]].nsubdirs, fs1[ri1[inodekey(m)]].size + 1)] [adr2, dentrynode(dentrykey(m, str), n) ] [adr3, inodenode(inodekey(n), md, false, 1, 0, 0) ], fi ⊖ fo) ∧ ¬ adr1 ∈ replay-log (log0, fs1[adr1, inodenode(inodekey(m), md0, true, fs1[ri1[inodekey(m)]].nlink, fs1[ri1[inodekey(m)]].nsubdirs, fs1[ri1[inodekey(m)]].size + 1)] [adr2, dentrynode(dentrykey(m, str), n) ] [adr3, inodenode(inodekey(n), md, false, 1, 0, 0) ], fi ⊖ fo) ∧ ¬ adr2 ∈ replay-log (log0, fs1[adr1, inodenode(inodekey(m), md0, true, fs1[ri1[inodekey(m)]].nlink, fs1[ri1[inodekey(m)]].nsubdirs, fs1[ri1[inodekey(m)]].size + 1)] [adr2, dentrynode(dentrykey(m, str), n) ] [adr3, inodenode(inodekey(n), md, false, 1, 0, 0) ], fi ⊖ fo) [inodekey(m), adr1 ] ∧ ¬ adr3 ∈ replay-log (log0, fs1[adr1, inodenode(inodekey(m), md0, true, fs1[ri1[inodekey(m)]].nlink, fs1[ri1[inodekey(m)]].nsubdirs, fs1[ri1[inodekey(m)]].size + 1)] [adr2, dentrynode(dentrykey(m, str), n) ] [adr3, inodenode(inodekey(n), md, false, 1, 0, 0) ], fi ⊖ fo) [inodekey(m), adr1 ] [dentrykey(m, str), adr2 ] ∧ replay-log (log0, fs1[adr1, inodenode(inodekey(m), md0, true, fs1[ri1[inodekey(m)]].nlink, fs1[ri1[inodekey(m)]].nsubdirs, fs1[ri1[inodekey(m)]].size + 1)] [adr2, dentrynode(dentrykey(m, str), n) ] [adr3, inodenode(inodekey(n), md, false, 1, 0, 0) ], fi ⊖ fo) [inodekey(m), adr1 ] [dentrykey(m, str), adr2 ] [inodekey(n), adr3 ] = ri1[inodekey(m), adr1][dentrykey(m, str), adr2][inodekey(n), adr3] ⊖ ro, ((inodekey(m) = key ⊃ adr1;ri1[key]) = adr2 ∨ (inodekey(m) = key ⊃ adr1;ri1[key]) = adr1 ∨ (inodekey(m) = key ⊃ adr1;ri1[key]) ∈ fs1) ∧ key-cons (key, (adr2 = (inodekey(m) = key ⊃ adr1;ri1[key]) ⊃ dentrynode(dentrykey(m, str), n) ;(adr1 = (inodekey(m) = key ⊃ adr1;ri1[key]) ⊃ inodenode(inodekey(m), md0, true, fs1[ri1[inodekey(m)]].nlink, fs1[ri1[inodekey(m)]].nsubdirs, fs1[ri1[inodekey(m)]].size + 1) ;fs1[(inodekey(m) = key ⊃ adr1;ri1[key])] ) ))

Proof step 107 from proof inv-create (previous step)

Heuristic nonsplitting cut applied rule cut formula

And closed the goal!

Rule argument

Additional information