[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]



View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 11 from proof ubifs-cons-reduce (previous step)

fo1.inodes?, ro1.inodes?, log-cons(log1, fs1), ri-closed(ri1, fs1, ro1), ubifs-cons(fs0, ri0, ro0, fi0, fo0, log0), key ∈ ri1, fo1 ⊆ dom fi1, ro1 ⊆ dom ri1, key ∈ ri0 → ri0[key] ∈ fs0 ∧ fs0[ri0[key]].key = key ∧ (key.inode? → fs0[ri0[key]].inode? ∧ key.ino ≠ 0) ∧ ( key.dentry? → fs0[ri0[key]].dentry? ∧ inodekey(key.ino) ∈ ri0 ∧ inodekey(fs0[ri0[key]].ino) ∈ ri0 ∧ ¬ inodekey(key.ino) ∈ ro0 ∧ ¬ inodekey(fs0[ri0[key]].ino) ∈ ro0 ∧ fs0[ri0[inodekey(key.ino)]].directory) ∧ (key.data? → fs0[ri0[key]].data? ∧ inodekey(key.ino) ∈ ri0 ∧ ¬ fs0[ri0[inodekey(key.ino)]].directory ∧ # fs0[ri0[key]].data = VFS_PAGE_SIZE), ∀ key. key ∈ ri1 → ri1[key] ∈ fs1 ∧ key-cons(key, fs1[ri1[key]]) ⊦ dups(log1), inodekey(0) ∈ ri1, (key.inode? → fs1[ri1[key]].inode? ∧ key.ino ≠ 0) ∧ ( key.dentry? → fs1[ri1[key]].dentry? ∧ inodekey(key.ino) ∈ ri1 ∧ inodekey(fs1[ri1[key]].ino) ∈ ri1 ∧ ¬ inodekey(key.ino) ∈ ro1 ∧ ¬ inodekey(fs1[ri1[key]].ino) ∈ ro1 ∧ fs1[ri1[inodekey(key.ino)]].directory) ∧ (key.data? → fs1[ri1[key]].data? ∧ inodekey(key.ino) ∈ ri1 ∧ ¬ fs1[ri1[inodekey(key.ino)]].directory ∧ # fs1[ri1[key]].data = VFS_PAGE_SIZE)

Heuristic quantifier applied rule all left

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

pos: left 10 terms: key

Additional information

Used terms: key