[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]



View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 61 from proof ubifs-cons-reduce (previous step)

fo0.inodes?, ro0.inodes?, log-cons(log1, fs1), log-cons(log0, fs0), ri-closed(ri0, fs0, ro0), ri-cons(ri1, fs1), key ∈ ri1, key ∈ ri0, fo0 ⊆ dom fi0, ro0 ⊆ dom ri0, ro1 ⊆ dom ri1, fo1 ⊆ dom fi1, key ∈ ri0 → ri0[key] ∈ fs0 ∧ key-cons(key, fs0[ri0[key]]), ∀ key. key ∈ ro1 → key ∈ ri1, ∀ key. key ∈ fo1 → key ∈ fi1, ∀ adr. ( adr ∈ log0 → (fs0[adr].inode? → fs0[adr].key.inode? ∧ fs0[adr].key.ino ≠ 0) ∧ (fs0[adr].dentry? → fs0[adr].key.dentry?) ∧ (fs0[adr].data? → fs0[adr].key.data?) ∧ (fs0[adr].trunc? → fs0[adr].key.inode?)) → adr ∈ log1 → adr ∈ fs1 ∧ (fs1[adr].inode? → fs1[adr].key.inode? ∧ fs1[adr].key.ino ≠ 0) ∧ (fs1[adr].dentry? → fs1[adr].key.dentry?) ∧ (fs1[adr].data? → fs1[adr].key.data?) ∧ (fs1[adr].trunc? → fs1[adr].key.inode?) ⊦ dups(log0), node-closed(fs1[ri1[key]], ri1, fs1, ro1), inodekey(0) ∈ ri0, inodekey(0) ∈ ri1, (key.inode? → fs0[ri0[key]].inode? ∧ key.ino ≠ 0) ∧ ( key.dentry? → fs0[ri0[key]].dentry? ∧ inodekey(key.ino) ∈ ri0 ∧ inodekey(fs0[ri0[key]].ino) ∈ ri0 ∧ ¬ inodekey(key.ino) ∈ ro0 ∧ ¬ inodekey(fs0[ri0[key]].ino) ∈ ro0 ∧ fs0[ri0[inodekey(key.ino)]].directory) ∧ (key.data? → fs0[ri0[key]].data? ∧ inodekey(key.ino) ∈ ri0 ∧ ¬ fs0[ri0[inodekey(key.ino)]].directory ∧ # fs0[ri0[key]].data = VFS_PAGE_SIZE)

Heuristic simplifier applied rule simplifier

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

Additional information