[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]

View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 92 from proof refine-evict (previous step)

fs[ri[inodekey(ino)]].nlink = 0, orphans(fs, ri).inodes?, fo.inodes?, afs-cons(abs-dirs(fs, ri), abs-files(fs, ri)), file-node-cons(fs, ri), log-cons(log, fs), orphans-cons(fs, ri, orphans(fs, ri)), replay-cons-strong(fs, ri, orphans(fs, ri), fi, fo, log), ri-inj(ri), ri-inj(fi), ubifs-cons(fs, ri, orphans(fs, ri), fi, fo, log), inodekey(ino) ∈ ri, asynced → boolvar, inodekey(m) ∈ ri ∧ fs[ri[inodekey(m)]].directory ∧ m0 = fs[ri[inodekey(m)]].nlink ∧ m2 = fs[ri[inodekey(m)]].size ∧ m1 = fs[ri[inodekey(m)]].nsubdirs ∧ boolvar0 ∨ inodekey(m) ∈ ri ∧ ¬ fs[ri[inodekey(m)]].directory ∧ m0 = fs[ri[inodekey(m)]].nlink ∧ m1 = 0 ∧ ¬ boolvar0 ⊦ # dentrykeys(inodekey(ino), ri) = 0, dentrykeys(inodekey(ino), ri) = ∅, ino = ROOT_INO, m = ROOT_INO

Heuristic nonsplitting cut applied rule cut formula

And obtained the following new goals

Proof step 93:
fs[ri[inodekey(ino)]].nlink = 0, fo.inodes?, orphans(fs, ri).inodes?, afs-cons(abs-dirs(fs, ri), abs-files(fs, ri)), file-node-cons(fs, ri), log-cons(log, fs), orphans-cons(fs, ri, orphans(fs, ri)), replay-cons-strong(fs, ri, orphans(fs, ri), fi, fo, log), ri-inj(fi), ri-inj(ri), ubifs-cons(fs, ri, orphans(fs, ri), fi, fo, log), inodekey(ino) ∈ ri, inodekey(m) ∈ ri, asynced → boolvar, inodekey(m) ∈ ri ∧ fs[ri[inodekey(m)]].directory ∧ m0 = fs[ri[inodekey(m)]].nlink ∧ m2 = fs[ri[inodekey(m)]].size ∧ m1 = fs[ri[inodekey(m)]].nsubdirs ∧ boolvar0 ∨ inodekey(m) ∈ ri ∧ ¬ fs[ri[inodekey(m)]].directory ∧ m0 = fs[ri[inodekey(m)]].nlink ∧ m1 = 0 ∧ ¬ boolvar0 ⊦ # dentrykeys(inodekey(ino), ri) = 0, dentrykeys(inodekey(ino), ri) = ∅, ino = ROOT_INO, m = ROOT_INO

Rule argument

fma: inodekey(m) ∈ ri

Additional information

Used formulas: inodekey(m) ∈ ri