[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]



View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 11 from proof refine-fsync (previous step)

fs[ri[inodekey(m)]].inode?, fo.inodes?, orphans(fs, ri).inodes?, afs-cons(abs-dirs(fs, ri), abs-files(fs, ri)), file-node-cons(fs, ri), log-cons(log, fs), orphans-cons(fs, ri, orphans(fs, ri)), replay-cons-strong(fs, ri, orphans(fs, ri), fi, fo, log), ri-inj(fi), ri-inj(ri), ubifs-cons(fs, ri, orphans(fs, ri), fi, fo, log), ri[inodekey(m)] ∈ fs, inodekey(m) ∈ ri, ¬ fs[ri[inodekey(m)]].directory, asynced → boolvar1 ⊦ ⟨fail_or_success#(; ; err); choose bv with true in asynced := bv⟩ ((asynced → boolvar1) ∧ ESUCCESS = err)

Heuristic elimination applied rule insert elim lemma

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

spec: node name: elim-03 seq: ⊦ nd.inode? → ( ( ( ( (key = nd.key ∧ md = nd.meta) ∧ (boolvar ↔ nd.directory)) ∧ m = nd.nlink) ∧ m0 = nd.nsubdirs) ∧ m1 = nd.size ↔ nd = inodenode(key, md, boolvar, m, m0, m1)) subst: [nd, key, md, boolvar, m, m0, m1] → [fs[ri[inodekey(m)]], key, md, boolvar, m0, m1, m2]

Additional information

Used simplifier rules: ⊦ nd.inode? → ( ( ( ( (key = nd.key ∧ md = nd.meta) ∧ (boolvar ↔ nd.directory)) ∧ m = nd.nlink) ∧ m0 = nd.nsubdirs) ∧ m1 = nd.size ↔ nd = inodenode(key, md, boolvar, m, m0, m1)); (elim) Used terms: fs[ri[inodekey(m)]], key, md, boolvar, m0, m1, m2