[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]



View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 16 from proof refine-iget (previous step)

boolvar0 ↔ boolvar1, key = inodekey(ino), ro = orphans(fs, ri), fo.inodes?, orphans(fs, ri).inodes?, afs-cons(abs-dirs(fs, ri), abs-files(fs, ri)), file-node-cons(fs, ri), log-cons(log, fs), orphans-cons(fs, ri, orphans(fs, ri)), replay-cons-strong(fs, ri, orphans(fs, ri), fi, fo, log), ri-inj(fi), ri-inj(ri), ubifs-cons(fs, ri, orphans(fs, ri), fi, fo, log), inodekey(ino) ∈ ri, asynced → boolvar1 ⊦ [if ri-cons(ri, fs) then {fail_or_success#(; ; err); if err = ESUCCESS then {boolvar := key ∈ ri; if boolvar then nd := fs[ri[key]] else nd := ?} else boolvar := ?, nd := ?} else abort; inode := p_inode; if err = ESUCCESS ∧ boolvar then inode := mkinode(ino, nd.meta, nd.directory, nd.nlink, (nd.directory ⊃ nd.nsubdirs;0), nd.size)] ⟨afs_iget#(ino, abs-dirs(fs, ri), abs-files(fs, ri), asynced; p_inode, err0)⟩ ((asynced → boolvar1) ∧ inode = p_inode ∧ err = err0)

Heuristic symbolic execution applied rule if positive right

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

pos: right 1

Additional information

Used simplifier rules: ⊦ ubifs-cons(fs, ri, ro, fi, fo, log) → ri-cons(ri, fs); (ss)