[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]



View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 175 from proof refine-write-inode (previous step)

dirs = abs-dirs(fs, ri), err = err0, files = abs-files(fs, ri), inode = mkinode(m, md, boolvar0, fs[ri[inodekey(m)]].nlink, fs[ri[inodekey(m)]].nsubdirs, m2), fs[ri[inodekey(m)]].inode?, orphans(fs, ri).inodes?, fo.inodes?, afs-cons(abs-dirs(fs, ri), abs-files(fs, ri)), file-node-cons(fs, ri), log-cons(log, fs), orphans-cons(fs, ri, orphans(fs, ri)), pre-write-inode(inode, dirs, files), replay-cons-strong(fs, ri, orphans(fs, ri), fi, fo, log), ri-cons(ri, fs), ri-inj(ri), ri-inj(fi), ubifs-cons(fs, ri, orphans(fs, ri), fi, fo, log), inodekey(m) ∈ ri, ri[inodekey(m)] ∈ fs, asynced → boolvar1, ∀ adr0. adr0 ∈ fs, ¬ fs[ri[inodekey(m)]].directory ∧ ¬ boolvar0 ∨ fs[ri[inodekey(m)]].directory ∧ boolvar0 ∧ m2 = fs[ri[inodekey(m)]].size, fs[ri[inodekey(m)]].directory ∧ m2 = fs[ri[inodekey(m)]].size ∧ boolvar0 ∨ ¬ fs[ri[inodekey(m)]].directory ∧ fs[ri[inodekey(m)]].nsubdirs = 0 ∧ ¬ boolvar0 ⊦ ⟨ {if inode.directory then dirs[inode.ino].meta := inode.meta else {files[inode.ino].meta := inode.meta; files[inode.ino].size := inode.size}; err := ESUCCESS} or fail#(; ; err); asynced := ?⟩ (dirs = abs-dirs(fs, ri) ∧ files = abs-files(fs, ri) ∧ (asynced → boolvar) ∧ ENOSPC = err), m = 0

Heuristic symbolic execution applied rule or right

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

Additional information