[Imprint]
[Data Privacy Statement]
[E-Mail]
View
long theorem info
. View
the proof
. Back to
main index
. View
the specification
. View
theorem base summary
, View
theorem base listing
, the
used properties by spec
, the
dependency list
, the
symbol table
,
Proof step 12 from proof orphans-cons-gc-one (
previous step
)
ri-cons(ri, fs), inodekey(ino) ∈ ri, ∀ ino. inodekey(ino) ∈ ri → (fs[ri[inodekey(ino)]].nlink = 0 ∧ ino ≠ ROOT_INO ↔ inodekey(ino) ∈ ro) ⊦ fs[ri[inodekey(ino)]].nlink = 0 ∧ ino ≠ ROOT_INO ↔ inodekey(ino) ∈ ro, adr ∈ fs
Heuristic quantifier applied rule all left
And closed the goal!
Rule argument
pos: left 3 terms: ino
Additional information
Used terms: ino