[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]



View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 12 from proof replay-cons-strong-append (previous step)

replay-log(log, fs, fi ⊖ fo) = ri ⊖ ro, log-cons(log, fs), node-cons(nd.key, nd), replay-safe(log, fs, fi ⊖ fo), ri-cons(ri, fs) ⊦ replay-safe(log, fs[adr, nd], fi ⊖ fo) ∧ ¬ adr ∈ replay-log(log, fs[adr, nd], fi ⊖ fo) ∧ replay-one(adr, nd, replay-log(log, fs[adr, nd], fi ⊖ fo)) = ri[nd.key, adr] ⊖ ro ↔ replay-one(adr, nd, ri ⊖ ro) = ri[nd.key, adr] ⊖ ro, adr ∈ fs

User applied rule insert rewrite lemma

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

spec: <toplevel> name: replay-safe-write seq: ⊦ ¬ adr ∈ log → (replay-safe(log, fs[adr, nd], ri) ↔ replay-safe(log, fs, ri)) subst: [ri, nd, adr, fs, log] → [fi ⊖ fo, nd, adr, fs, log] flags: <all paths>

Additional information

Used simplifier rules: ⊦ log-cons(log, fs) ∧ adr ∈ log → adr ∈ fs; (ss) Used terms: fi ⊖ fo, nd, adr, fs, log