[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]



View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 217 from proof inv-commit-rec-ind (previous step)

zh[r0] = mkznode(r1, zbrar, true, true, m0), istore[adr3] = istore2[adr3], zh0[r0] = mkznode(r2, zbrar0, boolvar0, boolvar1, m1), dom nodes(istore2) = dom nodes(istore), remove-refsize0(gstore1) = gstore1, remove-refsize0(istore0) = istore0, elems nx ∩ ginval1 = ∅, dom gstore1 ∪ elems nx = dom gstore2 ∪ ginval1, ((btree(rp, r0, adr3, 0, true, ri, nodes(istore2), ∅, ∅ ++ adr3, ok) * P))(zh0), ((btree(rp, r0, adr3, 0, dirty, ri, ∅, ∅, ∅ ++ adr3, ok) * P))(zh), ((btree(rp, r0, adr3, 0, dirty, ri, nodes(istore), ∅, ∅ ++ adr3, ok) * P))(zh), btree-sub-clean(r0, m0, zh), inv(istore2), inv(gstore2 \ ginval1), inv(gstore1), inv(istore), inv(istore0), refsize-cons(istore2, as0), refsize-cons(istore, as0), r0 ∈ zh0, m ∈ istore, r0 ∈ zh, adr3 ∈ istore, m ∈ istore2, adr3 ∈ istore2, as0 ⊆ dom nodes(istore), istore0 ⊑ istore2, istore ⊑ istore2, istore0 ⊑ istore, ⌊err⌋ , pstate0.journal? → nx ≠ [] ∧ pstate0.lnum = nx.last ∧ pstate0.lnum ∈ gstore2, pstate0.index? → pstate0.lnum ∈ istore2, pstate0 = unbuffered → syn, ∀ height0, zh, r0, r, zbrar, boolvar, m0, adr0, adr1, istore1, istore, pstate, m, istore0, gstore0, nx, ginval, as, as0, gstore, rp, dirty, ri, alladrs, P, adr, ino, ns, err, bv. height0 < 0 → zh[r0] = mkznode(r, zbrar, boolvar, true, m0) ∧ adr0 = adr1 ∧ istore1 = istore ∧ pstate = index(m) ∧ remove-refsize0(istore0) = istore0 ∧ remove-refsize0(gstore0) = gstore0 ∧ elems nx ∩ ginval = ∅ ∧ as ∩ as0 = ∅ ∧ dom gstore0 ∪ elems nx = dom gstore ∪ ginval ∧ ((btree(rp, r0, adr1, height0, dirty, ri, nodes(istore) | as, as, alladrs, ok) * P))(zh) ∧ inv(istore0) ∧ inv(istore) ∧ inv(gstore0) ∧ inv(gstore \ ginval) ∧ refsize-cons(istore, as0 ∪ as) ∧ m ∈ istore ∧ r0 ∈ zh ∧ as0 ⊆ dom nodes(istore) ∧ alladrs ⊆ dom nodes(istore) ∧ as ⊆ alladrs ∧ as ⊆ dom nodes(istore) ∧ istore0 ⊑ istore ∧ ¬ dups(nx) ∧ ¬ adr1 ∈ as ∧ (height0 = 0 → as = ∅) → ⟪btree_commit_rec#(r0, adr, istore0, ginval, gstore, gstore0, nx, ino, ns; adr1, err, zh, istore, pstate, bv)⟫ ( istore1 ⊑ istore ∧ (pstate.journal? → nx ≠ [] ∧ pstate.lnum = nx.last ∧ pstate.lnum ∈ gstore) ∧ (pstate.index? → pstate.lnum ∈ istore) ∧ (pstate = unbuffered → bv) ∧ inv(istore) ∧ istore0 ⊑ istore ∧ r0 ∈ zh ∧ (err = ESUCCESS → ¬ zh[r0].dirty ∧ pstate.index?) ∧ (∃ as1, alladrs1. refsize-cons(istore, as0 ∪ as1) ∧ as1 ∩ dom nodes(istore1) ⊆ as ∧ as1 ∩ as0 = ∅ ∧ alladrs1 ⊆ alladrs ∪ as1 ∧ ((btree(rp, r0, (err = ESUCCESS ⊃ adr1;adr0), height0, err ≠ ESUCCESS, ri, nodes(istore) | as1, as1, alladrs1, ok) * P))(zh))) ⊦ dups(nx), ∃ as, alladrs. refsize-cons(istore2, as0 ∪ as) ∧ as ∩ dom nodes(istore) = ∅ ∧ alladrs ⊆ as ++ adr3 ∧ ((btree(rp, r0, adr3, 0, true, ri, nodes(istore2) | as, as, alladrs, ok) * P))(zh0)

User applied rule exists right

And closed the goal!

Rule argument

pos: right 2 terms: ∅, ∅ ++ adr3 abort: F discard: T computed: F

Additional information

Used simplifier rules: ⊦ as ∪ ∅ = as; (s)%una: ⊦ (as ∪ as0) ∪ as1 = as ∪ as0 ∪ as1; from specification set-union[node-store]%unc: ⊦ as ∪ as0 = as0 ∪ as; from specification set-union[node-store]% ⊦ as ∩ ∅ = ∅; (s)%int-a: ⊦ (as ∩ as0) ∩ as1 = as ∩ as0 ∩ as1; from specification set-union[node-store]%int-c: ⊦ as ∩ as0 = as0 ∩ as; from specification set-union[node-store]% ⊦ ∅ ++ adr ⊆ as ↔ adr ∈ as; (s)% ⊦ adr ∈ ∅ ++ adr0 ↔ adr = adr0; (s)% ⊦ iast | ∅ = ∅; (s)%sep-ass: ⊦ (P * P3) * P4 = P * P3 * P4; from specification heap-sep[zheap]%sep-com: ⊦ P * P2 = P2 * P; from specification heap-sep[zheap]%⊦ (( btree (rp, r0, adr, height, dirty0, ri, iast, ∅, alladrs, nstat) * P) )(zh0) → ((btree(rp, r0, adr, height, dirty0, ri, ∅, ∅, alladrs, nstat) * P) )(zh0); (ss) Used terms: ∅, ∅ ++ adr3