Proof step 144 from proof inv-commit (previous step)

Heuristic symbolic execution applied rule assign right

And obtained the following new goals

• Proof step 145:

  istore0[m0] = indexblock(indx, lax, m3), zh[rp] = mkznode(r, zbrar, boolvar, true, m), zh0[rp] = mkznode(r0, zbrar0, boolvar0, false, m4), remove-refsize0(istore1) = istore1, remove-refsize0(gstore1) = gstore1, elems nx ∩ ginval4 = ∅, dom remove-refsize0(gstore2) ∩ ginval4 = ∅, dom gstore1 ∪ elems nx = dom gstore2 ∪ ginval4, btree-inv(rp, adr, istore3[n, indexblock([], [], 0)], istore1, zh, ri, fi), btree-inv(rp, adr, istore3, istore1, zh, ri, fi), btree-inv(rp, @(m0, m1, m2), istore0, istore0, zh0, ri, ri), btree-inv(rp, adr, istore0[m0, indexblock(indx, lax, m3 - m2)], istore1, zh0[rp, mkznode(r0, zbrar0, boolvar0, true, m4)], ri, fi), inv(istore3[n, indexblock([], [], 0)]), inv(istore1), inv(istore3), inv(gstore1), inv(gstore2 \ ginval4), inv(istore0), rp ∈ zh, istore1 ⊑ istore0, istore1 ⊑ istore3[n, indexblock([], [], 0)], istore1 ⊑ istore3, istore3[n, indexblock([], [], 0)] ⊑ istore0, pstate0.index? → pstate0.lnum ∈ istore0, pstate0.journal? → nx ≠ [] ∧ pstate0.lnum = nx.last ∧ pstate0.lnum ∈ gstore2, ⌊err⌋ ∨ err = ESUCCESS ⊦ [pstate := pstate0; skip or pstate := readonly] ( (pstate.journal? → nx ≠ [] ∧ pstate.lnum = nx.last ∧ pstate.lnum ∈ gstore2) ∧ (pstate.index? → pstate.lnum ∈ istore0) ∧ (pstate = unbuffered → err = ESUCCESS) → ⟪adr0 := adr; adr1 := @(m0, m1, m2); syn1 := err = ESUCCESS, pstate0 := pstate; err1 := err; if err1 = ESUCCESS then apersistence_commit# (adr1, maxino1, syn1; ginval1, adr0, istore0, istore1, ginval4, gstore2, gstore1, nx, maxino0, ginval, pstate0; err1); if err1 = ESUCCESS then adr := adr1 else if true then {zh0[rp].dirty := true; let maxino = 0 in {apersistence_get_iblock_refsize# (m0, adr0, istore0, istore1, ginval4, gstore2, gstore1, nx, maxino0, ginval, pstate0, syn1; ; maxino); apersistence_set_iblock_refsize# (m0, maxino - m2, adr0, istore1, ginval4, gstore2, gstore1, nx, maxino0, ginval, pstate0, syn1; istore0)}}⟫ ( (∃ ri, fi. btree-inv(rp, adr0, istore0, istore1, zh0, ri, fi)) ∧ inv(gstore2 \ ginval4) ∧ inv(gstore1) ∧ elems nx ∩ ginval4 = ∅ ∧ ¬ dups(nx) ∧ dom gstore1 ∪ elems nx = dom gstore2 ∪ ginval4 ∧ remove-refsize0(gstore1) = gstore1 ∧ inv(istore0) ∧ inv(istore1) ∧ istore1 ⊑ istore0 ∧ remove-refsize0(istore1) = istore1 ∧ (pstate0.journal? → nx ≠ [] ∧ pstate0.lnum = nx.last ∧ pstate0.lnum ∈ gstore2) ∧ (pstate0.index? → pstate0.lnum ∈ istore0) ∧ (pstate0 = unbuffered → syn1))), pstate0 = readonly, pstate0 = unbuffered, dups(nx), n ∈ istore3

Rule argument

Additional information