[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]



View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 185 from proof inv-commit (previous step)

syn1 ↔ true, zh0[rp] = mkznode(r0, zbrar0, boolvar0, false, m4), zh[rp] = mkznode(r, zbrar, boolvar, true, m), istore2[m0] = indexblock(indx, lax, m3), adr0 = @(m0, m1, m2), err1 = ESUCCESS, err1 = err, ginval = ginval0, ginval4 = ∅, gstore = gstore3, gstore0 = gstore4, gstore1 = remove-refsize0(gstore0), gstore2 = remove-refsize0(gstore0), istore = istore4, istore0 = remove-refsize0(istore2), istore1 = istore0, maxino2 = maxino0, nx = [], pstate1 = unbuffered, remove-refsize0(gstore3) = gstore3, remove-refsize0(istore4) = istore4, remove-refsize0(istore0) = istore0, remove-refsize0(remove-refsize0(gstore0)) = remove-refsize0(gstore0), dom remove-refsize0(gstore4) ∩ ginval0 = ∅, elems nx0 ∩ ginval0 = ∅, elems nx ∩ ∅ = ∅, dom gstore3 ∪ elems nx0 = dom gstore4 ∪ ginval0, dom remove-refsize0(gstore0) ∪ elems nx = dom remove-refsize0(gstore0) ∪ ∅, btree-inv(rp, adr, istore2[m0, indexblock(indx, lax, m3 - m2)], istore4, zh0[rp, mkznode(r0, zbrar0, boolvar0, true, m4)], ri, fi), btree-inv(rp, @(m0, m1, m2), istore2, istore2, zh0, ri, ri), btree-inv(rp, adr, istore3, istore4, zh, ri, fi), btree-inv(rp, adr, istore3[n, indexblock([], [], 0)], istore4, zh, ri, fi), inv(istore2), inv(gstore4 \ ginval0), inv(gstore3), inv(istore3), inv(istore4), inv(istore3[n, indexblock([], [], 0)]), inv(istore0), inv(remove-refsize0(gstore0)), inv(remove-refsize0(gstore0) \ ∅), rp ∈ zh, istore3[n, indexblock([], [], 0)] ⊑ istore2, istore4 ⊑ istore3, istore4 ⊑ istore3[n, indexblock([], [], 0)], istore4 ⊑ istore2, istore0 ⊑ istore0, pstate.journal? → nx0 ≠ [] ∧ pstate.lnum = nx0.last ∧ pstate.lnum ∈ gstore4, pstate.index? → pstate.lnum ∈ istore2, unbuffered.index? → unbuffered.lnum ∈ istore0, unbuffered.journal? → nx ≠ [] ∧ unbuffered.lnum = nx.last ∧ unbuffered.lnum ∈ remove-refsize0(gstore0), ⌊err⌋ ∨ err = ESUCCESS ⊦ pstate = readonly, pstate = unbuffered, dups(nx), dups(nx0), n ∈ istore3, (∃ ri, fi. btree-inv(rp, adr0, istore0, istore1, zh0, ri, fi)) ∧ inv(istore0) ∧ istore1 ⊑ istore0 ∧ (pstate1.journal? → nx ≠ [] ∧ pstate1.lnum = nx.last ∧ pstate1.lnum ∈ gstore2) ∧ (pstate1.index? → pstate1.lnum ∈ istore0) ∧ (pstate1 = unbuffered → syn1)

Heuristic simplifier applied rule simplifier

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

Additional information

Used simplifier rules: prefix-trans: ⊦ istore ⊑ istore0 ∧ istore0 ⊑ istore1 → istore ⊑ istore1; (forward) from specification ablock-store-inv[index-store]% ⊦ inv(istore) → inv(remove-refsize0(istore)); (ss)% ⊦ ¬ unbuffered.index?; (s)% ⊦ ¬ unbuffered.journal?; (s)% ⊦ ¬ ⌊ESUCCESS⌋ ; (s)% ⊦ ¬ dups([]); (s)% ⊦ gstore \ ∅ = gstore; (s)% ⊦ inv(istore) → istore ⊑ istore; (s)% ⊦ remove-refsize0(remove-refsize0(istore)) = remove-refsize0(istore); (s)% ⊦ remove-refsize0(remove-refsize0(gstore)) = remove-refsize0(gstore); (s)%int-c: ⊦ ns ∩ ns0 = ns0 ∩ ns; from specification set-union[nat-set]%int-a: ⊦ (ns ∩ ns0) ∩ ns1 = ns ∩ ns0 ∩ ns1; from specification set-union[nat-set]% ⊦ ns ∩ ∅ = ∅; (s)%unc: ⊦ ns ∪ ns0 = ns0 ∪ ns; from specification set-union[nat-set]%una: ⊦ (ns ∪ ns0) ∪ ns1 = ns ∪ ns0 ∪ ns1; from specification set-union[nat-set]% ⊦ ns ∪ ∅ = ns; (s)% ⊦ elems [] = ∅; (s)