[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]



View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 295 from proof inv-commit (previous step)

syn1 ↔ err = ESUCCESS, istore0[m0] = indexblock(indx, lax, m3), zh[rp] = mkznode(r, zbrar, boolvar, true, m), zh0[rp] = mkznode(r0, zbrar0, boolvar0, false, m4), adr0 = adr, adr1 = @(m0, m1, m2), err1 = err, pstate = pstate1, pstate0 = readonly, remove-refsize0(istore1) = istore1, remove-refsize0(gstore1) = gstore1, elems nx ∩ ginval4 = ∅, dom remove-refsize0(gstore2) ∩ ginval4 = ∅, dom gstore1 ∪ elems nx = dom gstore2 ∪ ginval4, btree-inv(rp, adr, istore3[n, indexblock([], [], 0)], istore1, zh, ri, fi), btree-inv(rp, adr, istore3, istore1, zh, ri, fi), btree-inv(rp, @(m0, m1, m2), istore0, istore0, zh0, ri, ri), btree-inv(rp, adr, istore0[m0, indexblock(indx, lax, m3 - m2)], istore1, zh0[rp, mkznode(r0, zbrar0, boolvar0, true, m4)], ri, fi), inv(istore3[n, indexblock([], [], 0)]), inv(istore1), inv(istore3), inv(gstore1), inv(gstore2 \ ginval4), inv(istore0), rp ∈ zh, istore1 ⊑ istore0, istore1 ⊑ istore3[n, indexblock([], [], 0)], istore1 ⊑ istore3, istore3[n, indexblock([], [], 0)] ⊑ istore0, pstate1.index? → pstate1.lnum ∈ istore0, pstate1.journal? → nx ≠ [] ∧ pstate1.lnum = nx.last ∧ pstate1.lnum ∈ gstore2, readonly = unbuffered → err = ESUCCESS, readonly.index? → readonly.lnum ∈ istore0, readonly.journal? → nx ≠ [] ∧ readonly.lnum = nx.last ∧ readonly.lnum ∈ gstore2, ⌊err⌋ ∨ err = ESUCCESS ⊦ ⟪if true then {zh0[rp].dirty := true; let maxino = 0 in {apersistence_get_iblock_refsize#(m0, adr0, istore0, istore1, ginval4, gstore2, gstore1, nx, maxino0, ginval, pstate0, syn1; ; maxino); apersistence_set_iblock_refsize# (m0, maxino - m2, adr0, istore1, ginval4, gstore2, gstore1, nx, maxino0, ginval, pstate0, syn1; istore0)}}⟫ ( (∃ ri, fi. btree-inv(rp, adr0, istore0, istore1, zh0, ri, fi)) ∧ inv(gstore2 \ ginval4) ∧ inv(gstore1) ∧ elems nx ∩ ginval4 = ∅ ∧ ¬ dups(nx) ∧ dom gstore1 ∪ elems nx = dom gstore2 ∪ ginval4 ∧ remove-refsize0(gstore1) = gstore1 ∧ inv(istore0) ∧ inv(istore1) ∧ istore1 ⊑ istore0 ∧ remove-refsize0(istore1) = istore1 ∧ (pstate0.journal? → nx ≠ [] ∧ pstate0.lnum = nx.last ∧ pstate0.lnum ∈ gstore2) ∧ (pstate0.index? → pstate0.lnum ∈ istore0) ∧ (pstate0 = unbuffered → syn1)), err1 = ESUCCESS, pstate1 = readonly, pstate1 = unbuffered, dups(nx), n ∈ istore3

Heuristic symbolic execution applied rule if positive right

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

pos: right 1

Additional information