[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]

View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 310 from proof inv-commit (previous step)

istore2[m0] = indexblock(indx, lax, m3), zh[rp] = mkznode(r, zbrar, boolvar, true, m), zh0[rp] = mkznode(r0, zbrar0, boolvar0, false, m4), remove-refsize0(istore1) = istore1, remove-refsize0(gstore1) = gstore1, elems nx ∩ ginval4 = ∅, dom remove-refsize0(gstore2) ∩ ginval4 = ∅, dom gstore1 ∪ elems nx = dom gstore2 ∪ ginval4, btree-inv(rp, adr, istore3[n0, indexblock([], [], 0)], istore1, zh, ri, fi), btree-inv(rp, adr, istore3, istore1, zh, ri, fi), btree-inv(rp, @(m0, m1, m2), istore2, istore2, zh0, ri, ri), btree-inv(rp, adr, istore2[m0, indexblock(indx, lax, m3 - m2)], istore1, zh0[rp, mkznode(r0, zbrar0, boolvar0, true, m4)], ri, fi), inv(indexblock(indx, lax, m3)), inv(istore3[n0, indexblock([], [], 0)]), inv(istore1), inv(istore3), inv(gstore1), inv(gstore2 \ ginval4), inv(istore2), inv(istore2[m0, indexblock(indx, lax, m3 - m2)]), rp ∈ zh, m0 ∈ istore2, m2 ≤ m3, istore1 ⊑ istore2, istore1 ⊑ istore2[m0, indexblock(indx, lax, m3 - m2)], istore1 ⊑ istore3[n0, indexblock([], [], 0)], istore1 ⊑ istore3, istore3[n0, indexblock([], [], 0)] ⊑ istore2, ⌊err⌋ , pstate1.index? → pstate1.lnum ∈ istore2, pstate1.journal? → nx ≠ [] ∧ pstate1.lnum = nx.last ∧ pstate1.lnum ∈ gstore2 ⊦ pstate1 = unbuffered, pstate1 = readonly, dups(nx), n0 ∈ istore3, ∃ ri0, fi0. btree-inv(rp, adr, istore2[m0, indexblock(indx, lax, m3 - m2)], istore1, zh0[rp, mkznode(r0, zbrar0, boolvar0, true, m4)], ri0, fi0)

Proof step 310 from proof inv-commit (previous step)

Heuristic quantifier closing applied rule exists right

And closed the goal!

Rule argument

Additional information