[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]



View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 9 from proof inv-commit (previous step)

adr = adr3, adr0 = adr3, err = ESUCCESS, pstate = unbuffered, remove-refsize0(gstore1) = gstore1, remove-refsize0(istore1) = istore1, ¬ syn, syn0, dom remove-refsize0(gstore2) ∩ ginval4 = ∅, elems nx ∩ ginval4 = ∅, dom gstore1 ∪ elems nx = dom gstore2 ∪ ginval4, btree-inv(rp, adr3, istore2, istore1, zh, ri, fi), inv(gstore2 \ ginval4), inv(gstore1), inv(istore2), inv(istore1), istore1 ⊑ istore2, ¬ dups(nx) ⊦ ⟪if rp ≠ null ∧ zh[rp].dirty then {apersistence_allocate_ind#(adr3, istore1, ginval4, gstore2, gstore1, nx, maxino0, ginval, true; istore2, pstate; err); if err = ESUCCESS then btree_commit_rec#(rp, adr0, istore1, ginval4, gstore2, gstore1, nx, maxino0, ginval; adr, err, zh, istore2, pstate, syn0); if err = ESUCCESS then {syn := true; apersistence_sync#(adr0, istore2, istore1, ginval4, gstore2, gstore1, nx, maxino0, ginval; pstate, syn0; err)}}; if err = ESUCCESS then apersistence_commit#(adr, maxino1, syn0; ginval1, adr0, istore2, istore1, ginval4, gstore2, gstore1, nx, maxino0, ginval, pstate; err); if err = ESUCCESS then adr3 := adr else if syn then {zh[rp].dirty := true; let maxino = 0 in {apersistence_get_iblock_refsize# (adr.lnum, adr0, istore2, istore1, ginval4, gstore2, gstore1, nx, maxino0, ginval, pstate, syn0; ; maxino); apersistence_set_iblock_refsize# (adr.lnum, maxino - adr.size, adr0, istore1, ginval4, gstore2, gstore1, nx, maxino0, ginval, pstate, syn0; istore2)}}⟫ ( (∃ ri, fi. btree-inv(rp, adr0, istore2, istore1, zh, ri, fi)) ∧ inv(gstore2 \ ginval4) ∧ inv(gstore1) ∧ elems nx ∩ ginval4 = ∅ ∧ ¬ dups(nx) ∧ dom gstore1 ∪ elems nx = dom gstore2 ∪ ginval4 ∧ remove-refsize0(gstore1) = gstore1 ∧ inv(istore2) ∧ inv(istore1) ∧ istore1 ⊑ istore2 ∧ remove-refsize0(istore1) = istore1 ∧ (pstate.journal? → nx ≠ [] ∧ pstate.lnum = nx.last ∧ pstate.lnum ∈ gstore2) ∧ (pstate.index? → pstate.lnum ∈ istore2) ∧ (pstate = unbuffered → syn0))

Heuristic elimination applied rule insert elim lemma

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

spec: znode name: elim seq: ⊦ ( ( (r = znd.parent ∧ zbrar = znd.zbranches) ∧ (boolvar ↔ znd.leaf)) ∧ (boolvar0 ↔ znd.dirty)) ∧ m = znd.usedsize ↔ znd = mkznode(r, zbrar, boolvar, boolvar0, m) subst: [znd, r, zbrar, boolvar, boolvar0, m] → [zh[rp], r, zbrar, boolvar0, boolvar1, m]

Additional information

Used simplifier rules: ⊦ ( ( (r = znd.parent ∧ zbrar = znd.zbranches) ∧ (boolvar ↔ znd.leaf)) ∧ (boolvar0 ↔ znd.dirty)) ∧ m = znd.usedsize ↔ znd = mkznode(r, zbrar, boolvar, boolvar0, m); (elim) Used terms: zh[rp], r, zbrar, boolvar0, boolvar1, m