[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]



View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 241 from proof inv-io-save (previous step)

istore4[m2] = indexblock(indx, lax0, m1), zh[r] = mkznode(r0, zbrar, boolvar, true, m0), istore4 [m2, indexblock(indx + save(mkznode(r0, zbrar, boolvar, true, m0)) ', lax0 + @(m3, save(mkznode(r0, zbrar, boolvar, true, m0)).flashsize) ', m1) ] [index(m2).lnum ] = indexblock(indx0, lax, m), istore0 = istore4 [m2, indexblock(indx + save(mkznode(r0, zbrar, boolvar, true, m0)) ', lax0 + @(m3, save(mkznode(r0, zbrar, boolvar, true, m0)).flashsize) ', m1) ], remove-refsize0(istore2) = istore2, remove-refsize0(gstore1) = gstore1, elems nx ∩ ginval2 = ∅, dom gstore1 ∪ elems nx = dom gstore2 ∪ ginval2, ((btree(rp, r, adr1, height, dirty, ri, nodes(istore4), as, alladrs, ok) * P))(zh), btree-sub-clean(r, m0, zh), inv(indexblock(indx, lax0, m1)), inv (istore4 [m2, indexblock(indx + save(mkznode(r0, zbrar, boolvar, true, m0)) ', lax0 + @(m3, save(mkznode(r0, zbrar, boolvar, true, m0)).flashsize) ', m1) ]), inv(istore2), inv(istore4), inv(gstore1), inv(gstore2 \ ginval2), refsize-cons(istore4, as0 ∪ as), m2 ∈ istore4, r ∈ zh, n ≤ LEB_SIZE, save(mkznode(r0, zbrar, boolvar, true, m0)).flashsize ≤ n, save(mkznode(r0, zbrar, boolvar, true, m0)).flashsize ≤ LEB_SIZE, as ⊆ dom nodes(istore4), as ⊆ alladrs, alladrs ⊆ dom nodes(istore4), as0 ⊆ dom nodes(istore4), istore2 ⊑ istore4, istore2 ⊑ istore4 [m2, indexblock(indx + save(mkznode(r0, zbrar, boolvar, true, m0)) ', lax0 + @(m3, save(mkznode(r0, zbrar, boolvar, true, m0)).flashsize) ', m1) ], height = 0 → as = ∅ ⊦ ⟪apersistence_set_iblock_refsize# (index(m2).lnum, m + save(mkznode(r0, zbrar, boolvar, true, m0)).flashsize, adr0, istore2, ginval2, gstore2, gstore1, nx, maxino1, ginval, index(m2), syn ; istore0); err := ESUCCESS; if err = ESUCCESS then zh[r].dirty := false⟫ ( refsize-cons(istore0, as0 ∪ (err = ESUCCESS ⊃ as ++ @(m2, m3, save(mkznode(r0, zbrar, boolvar, true, m0)).flashsize);as)) ∧ inv(istore0) ∧ istore2 ⊑ istore0 ∧ m2 ∈ istore0 ∧ istore4 ⊑ istore0 ∧ r ∈ zh ∧ (err = ESUCCESS → ¬ @(m2, m3, save(mkznode(r0, zbrar, boolvar, true, m0)).flashsize) ∈ as) ∧ dom nodes(istore0) = dom nodes(istore4) ∪ (err = ESUCCESS ⊃ ∅ ++ @(m2, m3, save(mkznode(r0, zbrar, boolvar, true, m0)).flashsize);∅) ∧ (( btree (rp, r, (err = ESUCCESS ⊃ @(m2, m3, save(mkznode(r0, zbrar, boolvar, true, m0)).flashsize);adr1), height, err ≠ ESUCCESS, ri, nodes(istore0), (err = ESUCCESS ⊃ as ++ @(m2, m3, save(mkznode(r0, zbrar, boolvar, true, m0)).flashsize);as), (err = ESUCCESS ⊃ (alladrs -- adr1) ++ @(m2, m3, save(mkznode(r0, zbrar, boolvar, true, m0)).flashsize);alladrs), ok) * P) )(zh) ∧ (err = ESUCCESS ∨ ⌊err⌋ ) ∧ (err = ESUCCESS → ¬ zh[r].dirty)), dups(nx), @(m2, m3, save(mkznode(r0, zbrar, boolvar, true, m0)).flashsize) ∈ istore2, @(m2, m3, save(mkznode(r0, zbrar, boolvar, true, m0)).flashsize) ∈ istore4, adr1 ∈ as

Heuristic simplifier applied rule simplifier

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

Additional information

Used simplifier rules: fwd-inv-iblock: ⊦ inv(istore) ∧ n ∈ istore ∧ istore[n] = iblock → inv(iblock); (forward) from specification apersistence-base% ⊦ ind ∈ ind0 ' ↔ ind = ind0; (s)% ⊦ ind ∈ indx + indx0 ↔ ind ∈ indx ∨ ind ∈ indx0; (s)% ⊦ ladr ∈ ladr0 ' ↔ ladr = ladr0; (s)% ⊦ ladr ∈ lax + lax0 ↔ ladr ∈ lax ∨ ladr ∈ lax0; (s)%a: ⊦ (indx + indx0) + indx1 = indx + indx0 + indx1; from specification list[index-store]%in-15: ⊦ indx + ind ' = indx0 → ind ∈ indx0; (forward) from specification list[index-store]%a: ⊦ (lax + lax0) + lax1 = lax + lax0 + lax1; from specification list[laddress-list]%in-15: ⊦ lax + ladr ' = lax0 → ladr ∈ lax0; (forward) from specification list[laddress-list]%⊦ indexblock(indx, lax, m) = indexblock(indx0, lax0, m0) ↔ indx = indx0 ∧ lax = lax0 ∧ m = m0; (ws)% ⊦ istore[n, iblock][n] = iblock; (s)% ⊦ index(m).lnum = m; (s)