[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]

View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 13 from proof btree-mark-dirty (previous step)

zh[r] = mkznode(rp0, zbrar, boolvar, false, height0), ((btree(rp, r, adr, height1 + 1, false, ri, iast, alladrs, alladrs, nstat) * P))(zh), adr ∈ iast, adr ∈ alladrs, r ∈ zh, alladrs ⊆ dom iast, ∀ zh, r, rp0, zbrar, boolvar, height0, rp, adr, ri, iast, alladrs, nstat, P. zh[r] = mkznode(rp0, zbrar, boolvar, false, height0) ∧ ((btree(rp, r, adr, height1, false, ri, iast, alladrs, alladrs, nstat) * P))(zh) ∧ r ∈ zh ∧ adr ∈ alladrs ∧ adr ∈ iast ∧ alladrs ⊆ dom iast ∧ (height1 = 0 → alladrs = ∅ ++ adr) → # alladrs = 0 ∨ alladrs = ∅ ∨ ((btree(rp, r, adr, height1, true, ri, iast, alladrs -- adr, alladrs, nstat) * P))(zh[r, mkznode(rp0, zbrar, boolvar, true, height0)]) ⊦ # alladrs = 0, alladrs = ∅, ((btree(rp, r, adr, height1 + 1, true, ri, iast, alladrs -- adr, alladrs, nstat) * P))(zh[r, mkznode(rp0, zbrar, boolvar, true, height0)])

User applied rule insert rewrite lemma

And obtained the following new goals

Proof step 14:
⊦ ((btree(rp, r0, adr, height, dirty0, ri, iast, as, alladrs, nstat) * P))(zh0) ↔ (∃ r, zh, zbrar, dirty, nused. (r0 = null ⊃ ¬ dirty ∧ P(zh0);r = r0 ∧ zh = zh0) ∧ (dirty → dirty0) ∧ (adr ∈ as ↔ ¬ dirty) ∧ adr ∈ alladrs ∧ nsize(nused, nstat) ∧ unmodified(adr, mkznode(rp, zbrar, height = 0, dirty, nused), iast) ∧ (( r => mkznode(rp, zbrar, height = 0, dirty, nused) * bnode(r, zbrar, 0, nused, nused, height, dirty, ri, iast, as -- adr, alladrs -- adr) * P) )(zh))
Proof step 15:
zh[r] = mkznode(rp0, zbrar, boolvar, false, height0), r ∈ zh, adr ∈ alladrs, adr ∈ iast, alladrs ⊆ dom iast, ∀ zh, r, rp0, zbrar, boolvar, height0, rp, adr, ri, iast, alladrs, nstat, P. zh[r] = mkznode(rp0, zbrar, boolvar, false, height0) ∧ ((btree(rp, r, adr, height1, false, ri, iast, alladrs, alladrs, nstat) * P))(zh) ∧ r ∈ zh ∧ adr ∈ alladrs ∧ adr ∈ iast ∧ alladrs ⊆ dom iast ∧ (height1 = 0 → alladrs = ∅ ++ adr) → # alladrs = 0 ∨ alladrs = ∅ ∨ ((btree(rp, r, adr, height1, true, ri, iast, alladrs -- adr, alladrs, nstat) * P))(zh[r, mkznode(rp0, zbrar, boolvar, true, height0)]), ∃ r1, zh1, zbrar, dirty, nused. (r = null ⊃ ¬ dirty ∧ P(zh);r1 = r ∧ zh1 = zh) ∧ (dirty → false) ∧ (adr ∈ alladrs ↔ ¬ dirty) ∧ adr ∈ alladrs ∧ nsize(nused, nstat) ∧ unmodified(adr, mkznode(rp, zbrar, height1 + 1 = 0, dirty, nused), iast) ∧ (( r1 => mkznode(rp, zbrar, height1 + 1 = 0, dirty, nused) * bnode(r1, zbrar, 0, nused, nused, height1 + 1, dirty, ri, iast, alladrs -- adr, alladrs -- adr) * P) )(zh1) ⊦ # alladrs = 0, alladrs = ∅, ((btree(rp, r, adr, height1 + 1, true, ri, iast, alladrs -- adr, alladrs, nstat) * P))(zh[r, mkznode(rp0, zbrar, boolvar, true, height0)])

Rule argument

spec: <toplevel> name: btree seq: ⊦ (( btree (rp, r0, adr, height, dirty0, ri, iast, as, alladrs, nstat) * P) )(zh0) ↔ (∃ r, zh, zbrar, dirty, nused. (r0 = null ⊃ ¬ dirty ∧ P(zh0);r = r0 ∧ zh = zh0) ∧ (dirty → dirty0) ∧ (adr ∈ as ↔ ¬ dirty) ∧ adr ∈ alladrs ∧ nsize(nused, nstat) ∧ unmodified (adr, mkznode(rp, zbrar, height = 0, dirty, nused), iast) ∧ (( r => mkznode(rp, zbrar, height = 0, dirty, nused) * bnode (r, zbrar, 0, nused, nused, height, dirty, ri, iast, as -- adr, alladrs -- adr) * P) )(zh)) subst: [zh0, P, nstat, alladrs, as, iast, ri, dirty0, height, adr, r0, rp] → [zh, P, nstat, alladrs, alladrs, iast, ri, false, height1 + 1, adr, r, rp] flags: <all paths>

Additional information

Used terms: zh, P, nstat, alladrs, alladrs, iast, ri, false, height1 + 1, adr, r, rp