[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]

View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 6 from proof initialization (previous step)

⊦ ∀ adr, adr0, istore, istore0, ginval1, gstore1, gstore2, nx0, maxino4, ginval2, pstate, syn0, rp, err. ( err = ESUCCESS → syn0 ∧ (∃ ri, fi. btree-inv(rp, adr0, istore, istore0, zh, ri, fi)) ∧ inv(gstore1 \ ginval1) ∧ inv(gstore2) ∧ elems nx0 ∩ ginval1 = ∅ ∧ ¬ dups(nx0) ∧ dom gstore2 ∪ elems nx0 = dom gstore1 ∪ ginval1 ∧ remove-refsize0(gstore2) = gstore2 ∧ inv(istore) ∧ inv(istore0) ∧ istore0 ⊑ istore ∧ remove-refsize0(istore0) = istore0 ∧ (pstate.journal? → nx0 ≠ [] ∧ pstate.lnum = nx0.last ∧ pstate.lnum ∈ gstore1) ∧ (pstate.index? → pstate.lnum ∈ istore)) ∧ (err = ESUCCESS ∨ ⌊err⌋ ) ∧ (err = ESUCCESS → btree-inv(rp, adr0, istore, istore0, zh, ∅, ∅) ∧ gstore1 = ∅ ∧ ginval1 = ∅ ∧ maxino4 = maxino2 ∧ nx0 = [] ∧ ginval2 = ∅) → ( err = ESUCCESS → ⟨index_format#(maxino3, LEB_SIZE, maxino2; ; fi1, fi2, ginval3, gstore3, gstore4, nx1, maxino5, ginval4, syn1, err0)⟩ ( ginval3 = ginval1 ∧ gstore3 = gstore1 ∧ gstore4 = gstore2 ∧ nx1 = nx0 ∧ maxino5 = maxino4 ∧ ginval4 = ginval2 ∧ btree-inv(rp, adr0, istore, istore0, zh, fi1, fi2) ∧ ri = fi1 ∧ fi3 = fi2 ∧ (syn1 ↔ syn0) ∧ ESUCCESS = err0)) ∧ ( err ≠ ESUCCESS → (∀ fi, fi0, ginval, gstore, gstore0, nx, maxino, ginval0, syn. ⟨index_format#(maxino3, LEB_SIZE, maxino2; ; fi1, fi2, ginval3, gstore3, gstore4, nx1, maxino5, ginval4, syn1, err0)⟩ ( fi = fi1 ∧ fi0 = fi2 ∧ ginval = ginval3 ∧ gstore = gstore3 ∧ gstore0 = gstore4 ∧ nx = nx1 ∧ maxino = maxino5 ∧ ginval0 = ginval4 ∧ (syn ↔ syn1) ∧ err = err0)))

Heuristic simplifier applied rule simplifier

And obtained the following new goals

Proof step 7:
err = ESUCCESS → btree-inv(rp, adr, istore0, istore, zh, ∅, ∅) ∧ gstore0 = ∅ ∧ ginval0 = ∅ ∧ maxino = maxino2 ∧ nx = [] ∧ ginval = ∅, err = ESUCCESS → syn ∧ btree-inv(rp, adr, istore0, istore, zh, ri0, fi) ∧ inv(gstore0 \ ginval0) ∧ inv(gstore) ∧ elems nx ∩ ginval0 = ∅ ∧ ¬ dups(nx) ∧ dom gstore ∪ elems nx = dom gstore0 ∪ ginval0 ∧ remove-refsize0(gstore) = gstore ∧ inv(istore0) ∧ inv(istore) ∧ istore ⊑ istore0 ∧ remove-refsize0(istore) = istore ∧ (pstate.journal? → nx ≠ [] ∧ pstate.lnum = nx.last ∧ pstate.lnum ∈ gstore0) ∧ (pstate.index? → pstate.lnum ∈ istore0), err = ESUCCESS ∨ ⌊err⌋ ⊦ ( err = ESUCCESS → ⟨index_format#(maxino3, LEB_SIZE, maxino2; ; fi1, fi2, ginval3, gstore3, gstore4, nx1, maxino5, ginval4, syn1, err0)⟩ ( ginval3 = ginval0 ∧ gstore3 = gstore0 ∧ gstore4 = gstore ∧ nx1 = nx ∧ maxino5 = maxino ∧ ginval4 = ginval ∧ btree-inv(rp, adr, istore0, istore, zh, fi1, fi2) ∧ ri = fi1 ∧ fi3 = fi2 ∧ (syn1 ↔ syn) ∧ ESUCCESS = err0)) ∧ ( err ≠ ESUCCESS → ⟨index_format#(maxino3, LEB_SIZE, maxino2; ; fi1, fi2, ginval3, gstore3, gstore4, nx1, maxino5, ginval4, syn1, err0)⟩ ( fi0 = fi1 ∧ fi4 = fi2 ∧ ginval1 = ginval3 ∧ gstore1 = gstore3 ∧ gstore2 = gstore4 ∧ nx0 = nx1 ∧ maxino0 = maxino5 ∧ ginval2 = ginval4 ∧ (syn0 ↔ syn1) ∧ err = err0))

Proof step 6 from proof initialization (previous step)

Heuristic simplifier applied rule simplifier

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

Additional information