[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]



View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 9 from proof refine-allocate-gnd (previous step)

ginval = ginval3, gstore = gstore3, nx = nx0, remove-refsize0(istore1) = istore1, remove-refsize0(gstore2) = gstore2, elems nx0 ∩ ginval3 = ∅, dom gstore2 ∪ elems nx0 = dom gstore3 ∪ ginval3, btree-inv(rp, adr, istore2, istore1, zh, fi, fi0), inv(istore1), inv(istore2), inv(gstore2), inv(gstore3 \ ginval3), ri-inj(fi0), ri-inj(fi), istore1 ⊑ istore2, ¬ dups(nx0), pstate.index? → pstate.lnum ∈ istore2, pstate.journal? → nx0 ≠ [] ∧ pstate.lnum = nx0.last ∧ pstate.lnum ∈ gstore3 ⊦ [apersistence_allocate_gnd#(adr, istore2, istore1, gstore2, maxino0, ginval2, true; ginval, gstore, nx, pstate; err)] ( inv(gstore \ ginval) ∧ elems nx ∩ ginval = ∅ ∧ ¬ dups(nx) ∧ dom gstore2 ∪ elems nx = dom gstore ∪ ginval ∧ (pstate.journal? → nx ≠ [] ∧ pstate.lnum = nx.last ∧ pstate.lnum ∈ gstore) ∧ (pstate.index? → pstate.lnum ∈ istore2) → ⟨index_allocate_gnd#(fi, fi0, gstore2, maxino0, ginval2, true; ginval3, gstore3, nx0; err0)⟩ (ginval3 = ginval ∧ gstore3 = gstore ∧ nx0 = nx ∧ err = err0))

User applied rule call right

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

pos: right 1

Additional information

Used simplifier rules: apersistence_allocate_gnd# (ROOTADR, ISTORE, ISTORE0, GSTORE0, MAXINO, OS, PSYNCED ; GINVAL, GSTORE, NL, PSTATE ; ERR ) {if PSYNCED then if PSTATE = readonly then ERR := EROFS else {fail_or_success#(; ; ERR); if ERR = ESUCCESS then choose N with ¬ N ∈ GSTORE in GSTORE[N] := groupblock([], [], 0), NL := NL + N, GINVAL := GINVAL -- N, PSTATE := journal(N)} else abort };