[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]



View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 36 from proof refine-get-block-free-size (previous step)

pstate = journal(m), remove-refsize0(gstore2) = gstore2, remove-refsize0(istore1) = istore1, elems nx0 ∩ ginval0 = ∅, dom gstore2 ∪ elems nx0 = dom gstore0 ∪ ginval0, pstate.journal?, btree-inv(rp, adr, istore2, istore1, zh, fi, fi0), inv(gstore0 \ ginval0), inv(gstore2), inv(istore2), inv(istore1), ri-inj(fi), ri-inj(fi0), istore1 ⊑ istore2, pstate.journal? → nx0 ≠ [] ∧ m = nx0.last ∧ m ∈ gstore0, pstate.index? → m ∈ istore2 ⊦ pstate = unbuffered, dups(nx0), ∃ n. n ≤ LEB_SIZE

Heuristic simplifier applied rule simplifier

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

Additional information

Used simplifier rules: fwd-inv-loghead: ⊦ nx ≠ [] ∧ inv(gstore \ ginval) ∧ ginval ∩ elems nx = ∅ ∧ dom gstore0 ∪ elems nx = dom gstore ∪ ginval → inv(gstore[nx.last]); (forward) from specification apersistence-base%fwd-in-gstore-loghead: ⊦ nx ≠ [] ∧ ginval ∩ elems nx = ∅ ∧ dom gstore0 ∪ elems nx = dom gstore ∪ ginval → nx.last ∈ gstore; (forward) from specification apersistence-base%unc: ⊦ ns ∪ ns0 = ns0 ∪ ns; from specification set-union[nat-set]%una: ⊦ (ns ∪ ns0) ∪ ns1 = ns ∪ ns0 ∪ ns1; from specification set-union[nat-set]%int-c: ⊦ ns ∩ ns0 = ns0 ∩ ns; from specification set-union[nat-set]%int-a: ⊦ (ns ∩ ns0) ∩ ns1 = ns ∩ ns0 ∩ ns1; from specification set-union[nat-set]% ⊦ ¬ journal(m).index?; (s)% ⊦ journal(m).journal?; (s)% ⊦ unbuffered ≠ journal(m); (s)