[Imprint]
[Data Privacy Statement]
[E-Mail]
View
long theorem info
. View
the proof
. Back to
main index
. View
the specification
. View
theorem base summary
, View
theorem base listing
, the
used properties by spec
, the
dependency list
, the
symbol table
,
Proof step 1 from proof ex-smallest-notin (conclusion)
⊦ ∃ n. ¬ n ∈ ns ∧ (∀ m. ¬ m ∈ ns → n ≤ m)
User applied rule apply lemma
And obtained the following new goals
Proof step 2
:
⊦ ∃ n. ¬ n ∈ ns
Proof step 3
:
∃ n. ¬ n ∈ ns ⊦ ∃ n. ¬ n ∈ ns ∧ (∀ m. ¬ m ∈ ns → n ≤ m)
Rule argument
spec: <toplevel> name: ex-notin seq: ⊦ ∃ n. ¬ n ∈ ns subst: [ns] → [ns]
Additional information
Used terms: ns