[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]



View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 68 from proof inv-addn (previous step)

# gndx0 = # lax1, # lax = # gndx, gstore3[nx0.last] = groupblock(gndx0, lax1, m), abs-log(nx0, gstore3 ↓) = abs-log(nx1, gstore2 ↓), nodes(gstore3 ↓, jro0) = nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro1), remove-refsize0(gstore1) = gstore1, elems nx1 ∩ jro1 = ∅, (nx0.toSet \ nx1.toSet) ∩ dom gstore2 = ∅, elems nx0 ∩ jro0 = ∅, dom gstore1 ∪ elems nx1 = dom gstore2 ∪ jro1, dom gstore1 ∪ elems nx0 = dom gstore3 ∪ jro0, nx0 ≠ [], pmaxino ≠ 0, p_os < pmaxino, fi2.inos < jmaxino1, fi1.inos < pmaxino, inv(groupblock(gndx0 + gndx, lax1 + lax, m)), inv(gstore1), inv(gstore2 \ jro1), inv(gstore3 \ jro0), inv(groupblock(gndx0, lax1, m)), inv-flashsize(gndx, lax), refsize-cons(gstore2, range fi2), refsize-cons(gstore1, range fi1), refsize-cons(gstore3, range fi2), ri-inj(fi2), ri-inj(fi1), transaction(ndx, gndx), valid-journal-head(nx0, gstore3, jro0), nx0.last ∈ gstore3, pmaxino ≤ jmaxino1, fi2.lebs ⊆ dom gstore3, fi2.lebs ⊆ dom gstore2, fi1.lebs ⊆ dom gstore1, dom gstore2 ⊆ dom gstore3, ¬ dups(nx0), ¬ dups(nx1), ¬ dups(lax), jvalid4 ∧ nx1 ≠ [] → valid-journal-head(nx1, gstore2, jro1) ⊦ [fail_or_success#(; ; err); if err = ESUCCESS then jvalid := true else jvalid := ?] ( valid-journal-head(nx0, gstore3[nx0.last, (gstore3[nx0.last].gndlist:= (gndx0 + gndx)).ladrlist:= (lax1 + lax)], jro0) ∧ refsize-cons(gstore3[nx0.last, (gstore3[nx0.last].gndlist:= (gndx0 + gndx)).ladrlist:= (lax1 + lax)], range fi2) ∧ nodes-cons(lax.to-adr(nx0.last), ndx, gstore3[nx0.last, (gstore3[nx0.last].gndlist:= (gndx0 + gndx)).ladrlist:= (lax1 + lax)], jro0) ∧ abs-log(nx0.butlast, gstore3 ↓) + prefixn((gndx = [] ⊃ # lax1;# lax1 + # gndx), lax1 + lax).to-adr(nx0.last) = abs-log(nx1, gstore2 ↓) + lax.to-adr(nx0.last) ∧ nodes(gstore3 ↓[nx0.last, ((gstore3[nx0.last].gndlist:= (gndx0 + gndx)).ladrlist:= (lax1 + lax))↓], jro0) = nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro1)[lax.to-adr(nx0.last), ndx] ∧ new(lax.to-adr(nx0.last), nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro1)))

Heuristic unfold applied rule call right

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

pos: right 1

Additional information

Used simplifier rules: fail_or_success#(; ; ERR) {choose ERR0 with ⌊ERR0⌋ ∨ ERR0 = ESUCCESS in ERR := ERR0};