[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]



View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 32 from proof inv-allocate (previous step)

fi = fi1, fi0 = fi2, gstore = gstore2, gstore0 = gstore3, remove-refsize0(gstore2) = gstore2, elems nx ∩ jro = ∅, dom gstore2 ∪ elems nx = dom gstore3 ∪ jro, n0 < LEB_SIZE, n0 < jmaxino, fi1.inos < pmaxino, fi2.inos < jmaxino1, p_os < pmaxino, inv(gstore2), inv(gstore3 \ jro), inv(gstore3[nx.last]), refsize-cons(gstore2, range fi1), refsize-cons(gstore3, range fi2), ri-inj(fi1), ri-inj(fi2), valid-journal-head(nx, gstore3, jro), nx.last ∈ gstore3, pmaxino ≤ jmaxino1, jmaxino ≤ LEB_SIZE, fi1.lebs ⊆ dom gstore2, fi2.lebs ⊆ dom gstore3 ⊦ ⟪fail_or_success#(; ; err); if err = ESUCCESS then jvalid := true else jvalid := ?; nx0 := nx; jro0 := jro; gstore1 := gstore3; if err = ESUCCESS then index_allocate_gnd#(fi2, fi1, gstore2, pmaxino, p_os, jvalid; jro, gstore3, nx; err); jvalid1 := true; if err = ESUCCESS then jvalid1 := true⟫ ( (jvalid1 ∧ nx ≠ [] → valid-journal-head(nx, gstore3, jro)) ∧ fi2.lebs ⊆ dom gstore3 ∧ refsize-cons(gstore3, range fi2) ∧ inv(gstore3 \ jro) ∧ elems nx ∩ jro = ∅ ∧ ¬ dups(nx) ∧ dom gstore2 ∪ elems nx = dom gstore3 ∪ jro ∧ (err = ESUCCESS ∨ ⌊err⌋ ) ∧ dom gstore1 ⊆ dom gstore3 ∧ (nx.toSet \ nx0.toSet) ∩ dom gstore1 = ∅ ∧ abs-log(nx, gstore3 ↓) = abs-log(nx0, gstore1 ↓) ∧ nodes(gstore3 ↓, jro) = nodes(gstore1 ↓, jro0) ∧ (err = ESUCCESS → jvalid1 ∧ nx ≠ [])), nx = [], pmaxino = 0, dups(nx)

Heuristic simplifier applied rule simplifier

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

Additional information