[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]



View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 66 from proof inv-allocate (previous step)

jvalid1 ↔ true, err = err0, gstore = gstore3, jro0 = jro, nx0 = nx, remove-refsize0(gstore2) = gstore2, elems nx ∩ jro = ∅, dom gstore2 ∪ elems nx = dom gstore3 ∪ jro, dom gstore2 ∪ elems nx = dom gstore ∪ jro, p_os < pmaxino, fi2.inos < jmaxino1, fi1.inos < pmaxino, n0 < jmaxino, n0 < LEB_SIZE, inv(gstore3[nx.last]), inv(gstore3 \ jro), inv(gstore2), inv(gstore \ jro), refsize-cons(gstore3, range fi2), refsize-cons(gstore2, range fi1), ri-inj(fi1), ri-inj(fi2), valid-journal-head(nx, gstore3, jro), nx.last ∈ gstore3, jmaxino ≤ LEB_SIZE, pmaxino ≤ jmaxino1, fi2.lebs ⊆ dom gstore3, fi1.lebs ⊆ dom gstore2, ⌊err0⌋ ∨ err0 = ESUCCESS ⊦ ⟪if err = ESUCCESS then jvalid1 := true⟫ ( (jvalid1 ∧ nx ≠ [] → valid-journal-head(nx, gstore, jro)) ∧ fi2.lebs ⊆ dom gstore ∧ refsize-cons(gstore, range fi2) ∧ (err = ESUCCESS ∨ ⌊err⌋ ) ∧ dom gstore3 ⊆ dom gstore ∧ (nx.toSet \ nx0.toSet) ∩ dom gstore3 = ∅ ∧ abs-log(nx, gstore ↓) = abs-log(nx0, gstore3 ↓) ∧ nodes(gstore ↓, jro) = nodes(gstore3 ↓, jro0) ∧ (err = ESUCCESS → jvalid1 ∧ nx ≠ [])), err = ESUCCESS, nx = [], pmaxino = 0, dups(nx)

Heuristic symbolic execution applied rule if negative right

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

pos: right 1

Additional information