[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]



View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 34 from proof inv-lookup (previous step)

fi2[key] = @(m, m0, m1), remove-refsize0(gstore1) = gstore1, elems nx ∩ jro = ∅, dom gstore1 ∪ elems nx = dom gstore2 ∪ jro, p_os < pmaxino, fi2.inos < jmaxino, fi1.inos < pmaxino, inv(gstore2 \ jro), inv(gstore1), refsize-cons(gstore2, range fi2), refsize-cons(gstore1, range fi1), ri-cons(fi2, nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro)), ri-inj(fi2), ri-inj(fi1), @(m, m0, m1) ∈ gstore2, key ∈ fi2, m ∈ gstore2, pmaxino ≤ jmaxino, fi2.lebs ⊆ dom gstore2, fi1.lebs ⊆ dom gstore1, jvalid2 ∧ nx ≠ [] → valid-journal-head(nx, gstore2, jro) ⊦ pmaxino = 0, dups(nx), m ∈ jro, ∃ err0. ⌊err0⌋ ∨ err0 = ESUCCESS

Heuristic quantifier closing applied rule exists right

And closed the goal!

Rule argument

pos: right 4 terms: ECOMMIT

Additional information

Used simplifier rules: ⊦ ESUCCESS ≠ ECOMMIT; (s)% ⊦ ⌊ECOMMIT⌋ ; (s) Used terms: ECOMMIT