[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]



View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 58 from proof inv-truncate (previous step)

gstore2[m] = groupblock(gndx, lax, n1 + m1), gstore2[m, groupblock(gndx, lax, n1)][n] = groupblock(gndx0, lax0, m2), gstore2[n] = groupblock(gndx1, lax1, m3), dom gstore2 = dom gstore3, remove-refsize0(gstore1) = gstore1, elems nx ∩ jro = ∅, as0 ∩ range(fi1 \ datakeys(key, n0, fi1)) = ∅, dom gstore1 ∪ elems nx = dom gstore3 ∪ jro, p_os < pmaxino, fi1.inos < jmaxino, fi2.inos < pmaxino, gstore2 =○refsize gstore3, inv(gstore3 \ jro), inv(gstore1), inv(gstore2 \ jro), inv(gstore2[m, groupblock(gndx, lax, n1)] \ jro), refsize-cons(gstore3, range fi1), refsize-cons(gstore1, range fi2), ri-inj(fi1), ri-inj(fi1 \ datakeys(key, n0, fi1)), ri-inj(fi2), @(m, m0, m1) ∈ as0, m ∈ gstore2, n ∈ gstore2[m, groupblock(gndx, lax, n1)], pmaxino ≤ jmaxino, fi1.lebs ⊆ dom gstore3, fi2.lebs ⊆ dom gstore1, as0.lebs ⊆ dom gstore3, n ∈ gstore2 → m3 = ((range(fi1 \ datakeys(key, n0, fi1)) | n) ∪ (as0 | n)).size, jvalid2 ∧ nx ≠ [] → valid-journal-head(nx, gstore3, jro), jvalid2 ∧ nx ≠ [] → valid-journal-head(nx, gstore2, jro) ⊦ # as0 = 0, as0 = ∅, m2 = ((range(fi1 \ datakeys(key, n0, fi1)) | n) ∪ ((as0 -- @(m, m0, m1)) | n)).size, pmaxino = 0, dups(nx)

Heuristic nonsplitting cut applied rule cut formula

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

fma: n = m

Additional information

Used simplifier rules: ⊦ n ≠ n0 → gstore[n0, gblock][n] = gstore[n]; (s)% ⊦ m ≠ n → (as -- @(m, m0, m1)) | n = as | n; (s)% ⊦ n ≠ n0 → (n ∈ gstore[n0, gblock] ↔ n ∈ gstore); (s)%⊦ groupblock(gndx, lax, m) = groupblock(gndx0, lax0, m0) ↔ gndx = gndx0 ∧ lax = lax0 ∧ m = m0; (ws) Used formulas: n = m