[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]



View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 63 from proof inv-truncate (previous step)

m2 + m1 = ((range(fi1 \ datakeys(key, n0, fi1)) | m) ∪ (as0 | m)).size, gstore2[m] = groupblock(gndx1, lax1, m2 + m1), dom gstore2 = dom gstore3, remove-refsize0(gstore1) = gstore1, as0 ∩ range(fi1 \ datakeys(key, n0, fi1)) = ∅, elems nx ∩ jro = ∅, dom gstore1 ∪ elems nx = dom gstore3 ∪ jro, fi2.inos < pmaxino, fi1.inos < jmaxino, p_os < pmaxino, gstore2 =○refsize gstore3, inv(gstore2[m, groupblock(gndx1, lax1, m2)] \ jro), inv(gstore2 \ jro), inv(gstore1), inv(gstore3 \ jro), refsize-cons(gstore1, range fi2), refsize-cons(gstore3, range fi1), ri-inj(fi2), ri-inj(fi1 \ datakeys(key, n0, fi1)), ri-inj(fi1), @(m, m0, m1) ∈ fi1 \ datakeys(key, n0, fi1), m ∈ gstore2, @(m, m0, m1) ∈ as0, pmaxino ≤ jmaxino, as0.lebs ⊆ dom gstore3, fi2.lebs ⊆ dom gstore1, fi1.lebs ⊆ dom gstore3, jvalid2 ∧ nx ≠ [] → valid-journal-head(nx, gstore2, jro), jvalid2 ∧ nx ≠ [] → valid-journal-head(nx, gstore3, jro) ⊦ # as0 = 0, as0 = ∅, m1 = 0, pmaxino = 0, dups(nx)

User applied rule insert rewrite lemma

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

spec: set-basic, inst: node-store name: Extension seq: ⊦ as = as0 ↔ (∀ adr. adr ∈ as ↔ adr ∈ as0) subst: [as0, as] → [∅, as0 ∩ range(fi1 \ datakeys(key, n0, fi1))] flags: <all paths>

Additional information

Used terms: ∅, as0 ∩ range(fi1 \ datakeys(key, n0, fi1))