[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]



View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 76 from proof inv-truncate (previous step)

remove-refsize0(gstore1) = gstore1, as0 ∩ range(fi1 \ datakeys(key, n0, fi1)) = ∅, elems nx ∩ jro = ∅, dom gstore1 ∪ elems nx = dom gstore3 ∪ jro, fi2.inos < pmaxino, fi1.inos < jmaxino, p_os < pmaxino, gstore2 =○refsize gstore3, inv(gstore2 \ jro), inv(gstore1), inv(gstore3 \ jro), refsize-cons(gstore2, range(fi1 \ datakeys(key, n0, fi1)) ∪ as0), refsize-cons(gstore1, range fi2), refsize-cons(gstore3, range fi1), ri-inj(fi2), ri-inj(fi1), ri-inj(fi1 \ datakeys(key, n0, fi1)), @(m, m0, m1) ∈ as0, pmaxino ≤ jmaxino, as0.lebs ⊆ dom gstore3, fi2.lebs ⊆ dom gstore1, fi1.lebs ⊆ dom gstore3, jvalid2 ∧ nx ≠ [] → valid-journal-head(nx, gstore2, jro), jvalid2 ∧ nx ≠ [] → valid-journal-head(nx, gstore3, jro) ⊦ # as0 = 0, as0 = ∅, pmaxino = 0, dups(nx), m ∈ gstore2, m ∈ gstore3

User applied rule insert rewrite lemma

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

spec: set-basic, inst: nat-set name: Subset seq: ⊦ ns ⊆ ns0 ↔ (∀ n. n ∈ ns → n ∈ ns0) subst: [ns0, ns] → [dom gstore3, as0.lebs] flags: <all paths>

Additional information

Used terms: dom gstore3, as0.lebs