[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]

View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 5 from proof prepost-restore-log (previous step)

jvalid ↔ boolvar0, err = ESUCCESS, fi0 = ri, gstore = gstore1, gstore0 = gstore2, jro = ginval, log = [], log0 = ax, nx = nx1, nx0 = nx2, p_os = ns, pmaxino = maxino, elems nx2 ∩ ginval = ∅, inv(gstore2 \ ginval), elems nx2 ⊆ dom gstore2 ⊦ ⟪while nx0 ≠ [] ∧ err = ESUCCESS do {/* (term-restore-log: invariant elems nx0 ⊆ dom gstore0 ∧ elems nx0 ∩ jro = ∅ ∧ inv(gstore0) wfbound # nx0) */; gjournal_remove_nonend_blocks#(nx0.head, fi0, fi, jro, gstore0, gstore, nx, pmaxino, p_os, jvalid; log; err); nx0 := nx0.tail}⟫ ((err = ESUCCESS ∨ ⌊err⌋ ) ∧ (err = ESUCCESS → log = abs-log(nx2, gstore2 ↓)))

Heuristic simplifier applied rule simplifier

And obtained the following new goals

Proof step 6:
err = ESUCCESS, gstore0 = gstore2, log = [], nx0 = nx2, elems nx2 ∩ ginval = ∅, inv(gstore2 \ ginval), elems nx2 ⊆ dom gstore2 ⊦ ⟪while nx0 ≠ [] ∧ err = ESUCCESS do {/* (term-restore-log: invariant elems nx0 ⊆ dom gstore0 ∧ elems nx0 ∩ ginval = ∅ ∧ inv(gstore0) wfbound # nx0) */; gjournal_remove_nonend_blocks#(nx0.head, fi0, fi, ginval, gstore0, gstore, nx, pmaxino, p_os, jvalid; log; err); nx0 := nx0.tail}⟫ ((err = ESUCCESS ∨ ⌊err⌋ ) ∧ (err = ESUCCESS → log = abs-log(nx2, gstore2 ↓)))

Proof step 5 from proof prepost-restore-log (previous step)

Heuristic simplifier applied rule simplifier

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

Additional information