[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]



View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 58 from proof recovery (previous step)

jvalid0 ↔ jvalid2, fi = fi5, fo = fo1, fs = fs1, ks = ks0, log = log1, remove-refsize0(gstore3) = gstore3, ro = ro1, elems nx1 ∩ jro4 = ∅, dom gstore3 ∪ elems nx1 = dom gstore2 ∪ jro4, jro5.keys.inodes?, jro1.keys.inodes?, jro5 < jmaxino3, jro1 < jmaxino0, ri0.inos < jmaxino3, fi3.inos < jmaxino0, inv(gstore2 \ jro4), inv(gstore3), inv(crash(gstore2, gstore3, jro4, nx1) \ jro4), log-cons(abs-log(nx1, gstore2 ↓), nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro4)), refsize-cons(gstore2, range ri0), refsize-cons(gstore3, range fi3), ri-inj(ri0), ri-inj(fi3), jmaxino0 ≤ jmaxino3, ri0.lebs ⊆ dom gstore2, fi3.lebs ⊆ dom gstore3, ⌊err0⌋ , jvalid8 ∧ nx1 ≠ [] → valid-journal-head(nx1, gstore2, jro4) ⊦ ⟨fail_or_success#(; ; err); if err = ESUCCESS then {ri := fi, ro := fo, ax := log; ks := ro; jvalid := true} else ri := ?, fi := ?, fs := ?, log := ?, ro := ?, fo := ?, ax := ?, ks := ?, jvalid := ?⟩ (ri2 = ri ∧ fi0 = fi ∧ ro0 = ro ∧ fo0 = fo ∧ fs0 = fs ∧ log0 = ax ∧ (jvalid1 ↔ jvalid) ∧ log = ax ∧ jro1.keys = ks ∧ err0 = err), jmaxino0 = 0, jmaxino3 = 0, dups(nx1)

Heuristic unfold applied rule call right

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

pos: right 1

Additional information

Used simplifier rules: fail_or_success#(; ; ERR) {choose ERR0 with ⌊ERR0⌋ ∨ ERR0 = ESUCCESS in ERR := ERR0};