[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]



View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 61 from proof recovery (previous step)

remove-refsize0(gstore3) = gstore3, elems nx1 ∩ jro4 = ∅, dom gstore3 ∪ elems nx1 = dom gstore2 ∪ jro4, jmaxino0 ≠ 0, jmaxino3 ≠ 0, jro1.keys.inodes?, jro5.keys.inodes?, fi3.inos < jmaxino0, ri0.inos < jmaxino3, jro1 < jmaxino0, jro5 < jmaxino3, inv(crash(gstore2, gstore3, jro4, nx1) \ jro4), inv(gstore3), inv(gstore2 \ jro4), log-cons(abs-log(nx1, gstore2 ↓), nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro4)), refsize-cons(gstore3, range fi3), refsize-cons(gstore2, range ri0), ri-inj(fi3), ri-inj(ri0), jmaxino0 ≤ jmaxino3, fi3.lebs ⊆ dom gstore3, ri0.lebs ⊆ dom gstore2, ⌊err1⌋ , ¬ dups(nx1), jvalid8 ∧ nx1 ≠ [] → valid-journal-head(nx1, gstore2, jro4) ⊦ ∃ err0. (⌊err0⌋ ∨ err0 = ESUCCESS) ∧ ⟨err := err0; if err = ESUCCESS then {ri := fi, ro := fo, ax := log; ks := ro; jvalid := true} else ri := ?, fi := ?, fs := ?, log := ?, ro := ?, fo := ?, ax := ?, ks := ?, jvalid := ?⟩ (ri2 = ri ∧ fi0 = fi ∧ ro0 = ro ∧ fo0 = fo ∧ fs0 = fs ∧ log0 = ax ∧ (jvalid1 ↔ jvalid) ∧ log = ax ∧ jro1.keys = ks ∧ err1 = err)

User applied rule exists right

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

pos: right 1 terms: err1 abort: F discard: T computed: T

Additional information

Used terms: err1