[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]



View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 42 from proof refine-check-commit (previous step)

p_os0.keys = jro1.keys, ESUCCESS = err1, [] = abs-log(nx0, gstore0 ↓), nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro2) \ as = nodes(gstore0 ↓, jro), fs = nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro2), remove-refsize0(gstore1) = gstore1, ri = fi0, ro = jro1.keys, elems nx ∩ jro2 = ∅, dom remove-refsize0(gstore2) ∩ jro2 = ∅, as ∩ range fi0 = ∅, dom gstore1 ∪ elems nx = dom gstore2 ∪ jro2, jmaxino ≠ 0, pmaxino ≠ 0, jro1.keys.inodes?, p_os.keys.inodes?, fi0.inos < jmaxino, p_os < pmaxino, jro1 < jmaxino, fi1.inos < pmaxino, inv(gstore1), inv(gstore2 \ jro2), log-cons(abs-log(nx, gstore2 ↓), nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro2)), refsize-cons(gstore2, range fi0), refsize-cons(gstore1, range fi1), ri-cons(fi0, nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro2)), ri-inj(fi0), ri-inj(fi1), pmaxino ≤ jmaxino, fi0.lebs ⊆ dom gstore2, fi1.lebs ⊆ dom gstore1, ¬ dups(nx), jvalid1 ∧ nx ≠ [] → valid-journal-head(nx, gstore2, jro2), jvalid2 → jvalid0 ⊦ ⟨choose as with as ∩ range ri = ∅ in fi1 := ri, fo := ro, fs := fs \ as, log := [], err := ESUCCESS; jvalid := true⟩ (jro1.keys = fo ∧ fi0 = fi1 ∧ log = [] ∧ fs = nodes(gstore0 ↓, jro) ∧ err1 = err), ∃ err0. ⌊err0⌋ ∧ ⟨err := err0; jvalid := ?⟩ (jro1.keys = p_os.keys ∧ fi0 = fi1 ∧ abs-log(nx, gstore2 ↓) = [] ∧ nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro2) = nodes(gstore0 ↓, jro) ∧ ESUCCESS = err), jro1.keys = p_os.keys ∧ fi0 = fi1 ∧ abs-log(nx, gstore2 ↓) = [] ∧ nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro2) = nodes(gstore0 ↓, jro)

Heuristic symbolic execution applied rule choose right

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

Additional information