[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]



View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 55 from proof refine-commit (previous step)

remove-refsize0(gstore1) = gstore1, dom remove-refsize0(gstore2) ∩ jro3 = ∅, elems nx ∩ jro3 = ∅, dom gstore1 ∪ elems nx = dom gstore2 ∪ jro3, jmaxino ≠ 0, pmaxino ≠ 0, jro1.keys.inodes?, p_os.keys.inodes?, jro1 < jmaxino, p_os < pmaxino, ri.inos < jmaxino, fi1.inos < pmaxino, inv(gstore2 \ jro3), inv(gstore1), log-cons(abs-log(nx, gstore2 ↓), nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro3)), refsize-cons(gstore2, range ri), refsize-cons(gstore1, range fi1), ri-cons(ri, nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro3)), ri-inj(ri), ri-inj(fi1), pmaxino ≤ jmaxino, ri.lebs ⊆ dom gstore2, fi1.lebs ⊆ dom gstore1, ¬ dups(nx), jvalid2 → jvalid0, jvalid1 ∧ nx ≠ [] → valid-journal-head(nx, gstore2, jro3) ⊦ refsize0-addresses((gstore2 \ jro3)↓) ∩ range ri = ∅ ∧ ⟨fi1 := ri, fo := jro1.keys, fs := nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro3) \ refsize0-addresses((gstore2 \ jro3)↓), log := [], err := ESUCCESS; jvalid := true⟩ (jro1.keys = fo ∧ ri = fi1 ∧ log = [] ∧ fs = nodes(remove-refsize0(gstore2 ↓), ∅) ∧ ESUCCESS = err)

Heuristic dl case distinction applied rule case distinction

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

pos: right 1

Additional information