[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]



View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 79 from proof refine-commit (previous step)

fi = fi1, fo = p_os.keys, fs = nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro3), log = abs-log(nx, gstore2 ↓), remove-refsize0(gstore1) = gstore1, dom remove-refsize0(gstore2) ∩ jro3 = ∅, elems nx ∩ jro3 = ∅, dom gstore1 ∪ elems nx = dom gstore2 ∪ jro3, jmaxino ≠ 0, pmaxino ≠ 0, jro1.keys.inodes?, p_os.keys.inodes?, jro1 < jmaxino, p_os < pmaxino, ri.inos < jmaxino, fi1.inos < pmaxino, inv(gstore2 \ jro3), inv(gstore1), log-cons(abs-log(nx, gstore2 ↓), nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro3)), refsize-cons(gstore2, range ri), refsize-cons(gstore1, range fi1), ri-cons(ri, nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro3)), ri-inj(ri), ri-inj(fi1), pmaxino ≤ jmaxino, ri.lebs ⊆ dom gstore2, fi1.lebs ⊆ dom gstore1, ⌊err0⌋ , ¬ dups(nx), jvalid2 → jvalid0, jvalid1 ∧ nx ≠ [] → valid-journal-head(nx, gstore2, jro3) ⊦ ⟨aubifs_core_commit#(ri, jro1.keys; fs, fi1, fo, log; jvalid2, err1)⟩ (p_os.keys = fo ∧ fi = fi1 ∧ log = abs-log(nx, gstore2 ↓) ∧ fs = nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro3) ∧ err0 = err1)

Heuristic unfold applied rule call right

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

pos: right 1

Additional information

Used simplifier rules: aubifs_core_commit#(RI, RO; FS, FI, FO, LOG; CSYNCED, ERR) {if ri-cons(RI, FS) then { {choose AS with AS ∩ range RI = ∅ in FI := RI, FO := RO, FS := FS \ AS, LOG := [], ERR := ESUCCESS; CSYNCED := true} or {fail#(; ; ERR); CSYNCED := ?}} else abort };