[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]

View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 255 from proof refine-gc (previous step)

# ax0 = # referenced-adrs(lax.to-adr(n1), ri0), # lax = # gndx0, gstore2[n1] = groupblock(gndx0, lax, m0), abs-log(nx0, gstore3 ↓) = abs-log(nx1, gstore2 ↓) + ax0, fs = nodes(gstore3 ↓, jro), log = abs-log(nx0, gstore3 ↓), nodes(gstore3 ↓, jro) = nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0)[ax0, nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0)[referenced-adrs(lax.to-adr(n1), ri0)]], remove-refsize0(gstore1) = gstore1, ri = ri0[nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0)[referenced-adrs(lax.to-adr(n1), ri0)].keys, ax0], elems nx0 ∩ jro = ∅, (nx0.toSet \ nx1.toSet) ∩ dom gstore2 = ∅, elems nx1 ∩ jro0 = ∅, dom gstore1 ∪ elems nx0 = dom gstore3 ∪ jro, dom gstore1 ∪ elems nx1 = dom gstore2 ∪ jro0, p_os.keys.inodes?, jro1.keys.inodes?, jro1 < jmaxino0, ri0[nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0)[referenced-adrs(lax.to-adr(n1), ri0)].keys, ax0].inos < jmaxino0, jro1 < jmaxino, p_os < pmaxino, ri0.inos < jmaxino, fi1.inos < pmaxino, inv(gstore3 \ jro), inv(groupblock(gndx0, lax, m0)), inv(gstore1), inv(gstore2 \ jro0), log-cons(abs-log(nx1, gstore2 ↓), nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0)), new(ax0, nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0)), refsize-cons(gstore3, range ri0[nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0)[referenced-adrs(lax.to-adr(n1), ri0)].keys, ax0]), refsize-cons(gstore2, range ri0), refsize-cons(gstore1, range fi1), ri-cons(ri0, nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0)), ri-inj(ri0[nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0)[referenced-adrs(lax.to-adr(n1), ri0)].keys, ax0]), ri-inj(ri0), ri-inj(fi1), n1 ∈ gstore1, n1 ∈ gstore2, n1 ∈ gstore3, pmaxino ≤ jmaxino0, jmaxino ≤ jmaxino0, pmaxino ≤ jmaxino, ri0.lebs ⊆ dom gstore3, ri0[nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0)[referenced-adrs(lax.to-adr(n1), ri0)].keys, ax0].lebs ⊆ dom gstore3, dom gstore2 ⊆ dom gstore3, ri0.lebs ⊆ dom gstore2, fi1.lebs ⊆ dom gstore1, range ri0 ⊆ dom nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0), ⌊err0⌋ , jvalid5 → jvalid4, jvalid3 ∧ nx1 ≠ [] → valid-journal-head(nx1, gstore2, jro0), jvalid0 ∧ nx0 ≠ [] → valid-journal-head(nx0, gstore3, jro) ⊦ ⟨choose as with as ∩ range ri = ∅ ∧ log.toSet ∩ as = ∅ in fs := fs \ as; jvalid := ?⟩ (fs = nodes(gstore3 ↓, jro)), jmaxino = 0, jmaxino0 = 0, m0 = 0, pmaxino = 0, dups(ax0), dups(nx0), dups(nx1), dups(nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0)[referenced-adrs(lax.to-adr(n1), ri0)].keys), n1 ∈ nx0, n1 ∈ jro0, n1 ∈ nx1

Heuristic symbolic execution applied rule choose right

And obtained the following new goals

Proof step 256:
# lax = # gndx0, # ax0 = # referenced-adrs(lax.to-adr(n1), ri0), gstore2[n1] = groupblock(gndx0, lax, m0), abs-log(nx0, gstore3 ↓) = abs-log(nx1, gstore2 ↓) + ax0, fs = nodes(gstore3 ↓, jro), log = abs-log(nx0, gstore3 ↓), nodes(gstore3 ↓, jro) = nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0)[ax0, nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0)[referenced-adrs(lax.to-adr(n1), ri0)]], remove-refsize0(gstore1) = gstore1, ri = ri0[nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0)[referenced-adrs(lax.to-adr(n1), ri0)].keys, ax0], elems nx1 ∩ jro0 = ∅, (nx0.toSet \ nx1.toSet) ∩ dom gstore2 = ∅, elems nx0 ∩ jro = ∅, dom gstore1 ∪ elems nx1 = dom gstore2 ∪ jro0, dom gstore1 ∪ elems nx0 = dom gstore3 ∪ jro, jro1.keys.inodes?, p_os.keys.inodes?, fi1.inos < pmaxino, ri0.inos < jmaxino, p_os < pmaxino, jro1 < jmaxino, ri0[nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0)[referenced-adrs(lax.to-adr(n1), ri0)].keys, ax0].inos < jmaxino0, jro1 < jmaxino0, inv(gstore2 \ jro0), inv(gstore1), inv(groupblock(gndx0, lax, m0)), inv(gstore3 \ jro), log-cons(abs-log(nx1, gstore2 ↓), nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0)), new(ax0, nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0)), refsize-cons(gstore1, range fi1), refsize-cons(gstore2, range ri0), refsize-cons(gstore3, range ri0[nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0)[referenced-adrs(lax.to-adr(n1), ri0)].keys, ax0]), ri-cons(ri0, nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0)), ri-inj(fi1), ri-inj(ri0), ri-inj(ri0[nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0)[referenced-adrs(lax.to-adr(n1), ri0)].keys, ax0]), n1 ∈ gstore3, n1 ∈ gstore2, n1 ∈ gstore1, pmaxino ≤ jmaxino, jmaxino ≤ jmaxino0, pmaxino ≤ jmaxino0, range ri0 ⊆ dom nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0), fi1.lebs ⊆ dom gstore1, ri0.lebs ⊆ dom gstore2, dom gstore2 ⊆ dom gstore3, ri0[nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0)[referenced-adrs(lax.to-adr(n1), ri0)].keys, ax0].lebs ⊆ dom gstore3, ri0.lebs ⊆ dom gstore3, ⌊err0⌋ , jvalid0 ∧ nx0 ≠ [] → valid-journal-head(nx0, gstore3, jro), jvalid3 ∧ nx1 ≠ [] → valid-journal-head(nx1, gstore2, jro0), jvalid5 → jvalid4 ⊦ ∃ as. (as ∩ range ri = ∅ ∧ log.toSet ∩ as = ∅) ∧ ⟨fs := fs \ as; jvalid := ?⟩ (fs = nodes(gstore3 ↓, jro)), jmaxino = 0, jmaxino0 = 0, m0 = 0, pmaxino = 0, dups(nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0)[referenced-adrs(lax.to-adr(n1), ri0)].keys), dups(nx1), dups(nx0), dups(ax0), n1 ∈ nx1, n1 ∈ jro0, n1 ∈ nx0

Proof step 255 from proof refine-gc (previous step)

Heuristic symbolic execution applied rule choose right

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

Additional information