[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]



View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 259 from proof refine-gc (previous step)

# ax0 = # referenced-adrs(lax.to-adr(n1), ri0), # lax = # gndx0, gstore2[n1] = groupblock(gndx0, lax, m0), abs-log(nx0, gstore3 ↓) = abs-log(nx1, gstore2 ↓) + ax0, nodes(gstore3 ↓, jro) = nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0)[ax0, nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0)[referenced-adrs(lax.to-adr(n1), ri0)]], remove-refsize0(gstore1) = gstore1, elems nx0 ∩ jro = ∅, (nx0.toSet \ nx1.toSet) ∩ dom gstore2 = ∅, elems nx1 ∩ jro0 = ∅, dom gstore1 ∪ elems nx0 = dom gstore3 ∪ jro, dom gstore1 ∪ elems nx1 = dom gstore2 ∪ jro0, jmaxino ≠ 0, jmaxino0 ≠ 0, m0 ≠ 0, pmaxino ≠ 0, p_os.keys.inodes?, jro1.keys.inodes?, jro1 < jmaxino0, ri0[nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0)[referenced-adrs(lax.to-adr(n1), ri0)].keys, ax0].inos < jmaxino0, jro1 < jmaxino, p_os < pmaxino, ri0.inos < jmaxino, fi1.inos < pmaxino, inv(gstore3 \ jro), inv(groupblock(gndx0, lax, m0)), inv(gstore1), inv(gstore2 \ jro0), log-cons(abs-log(nx1, gstore2 ↓), nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0)), new(ax0, nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0)), refsize-cons(gstore3, range ri0[nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0)[referenced-adrs(lax.to-adr(n1), ri0)].keys, ax0]), refsize-cons(gstore2, range ri0), refsize-cons(gstore1, range fi1), ri-cons(ri0, nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0)), ri-inj(ri0[nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0)[referenced-adrs(lax.to-adr(n1), ri0)].keys, ax0]), ri-inj(ri0), ri-inj(fi1), n1 ∈ gstore1, n1 ∈ gstore2, n1 ∈ gstore3, pmaxino ≤ jmaxino0, jmaxino ≤ jmaxino0, pmaxino ≤ jmaxino, ri0[nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0)[referenced-adrs(lax.to-adr(n1), ri0)].keys, ax0].lebs ⊆ dom gstore3, dom gstore2 ⊆ dom gstore3, ri0.lebs ⊆ dom gstore2, fi1.lebs ⊆ dom gstore1, range ri0 ⊆ dom nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0), ri0.lebs ⊆ dom gstore3, ⌊err0⌋ , ¬ dups(nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0)[referenced-adrs(lax.to-adr(n1), ri0)].keys), ¬ dups(nx1), ¬ dups(nx0), ¬ dups(ax0), ¬ n1 ∈ nx1, ¬ n1 ∈ jro0, ¬ n1 ∈ nx0, jvalid5 → jvalid4, jvalid3 ∧ nx1 ≠ [] → valid-journal-head(nx1, gstore2, jro0), jvalid0 ∧ nx0 ≠ [] → valid-journal-head(nx0, gstore3, jro) ⊦ ⟨fs := nodes(gstore3 ↓, jro); jvalid := ?⟩ (fs = nodes(gstore3 ↓, jro))

Heuristic symbolic execution applied rule assign right

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

Additional information