[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]



View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 282 from proof refine-gc (previous step)

# lax = # gndx0, # ax0 = # referenced-adrs(lax.to-adr(n1), ri), gstore2[n1] = groupblock(gndx0, lax, m0), abs-log(nx0, gstore3 ↓) = abs-log(nx1, gstore2 ↓) + ax0, nodes(gstore3 ↓, jro) = nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0)[ax0, nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0)[referenced-adrs(lax.to-adr(n1), ri)]], remove-refsize0(gstore1) = gstore1, elems nx1 ∩ jro0 = ∅, (nx0.toSet \ nx1.toSet) ∩ dom gstore2 = ∅, elems nx0 ∩ jro = ∅, dom gstore1 ∪ elems nx1 = dom gstore2 ∪ jro0, dom gstore1 ∪ elems nx0 = dom gstore3 ∪ jro, jro1.keys.inodes?, p_os.keys.inodes?, fi1.inos < pmaxino, ri.inos < jmaxino, p_os < pmaxino, jro1 < jmaxino, ri[nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0)[referenced-adrs(lax.to-adr(n1), ri)].keys, ax0].inos < jmaxino0, jro1 < jmaxino0, inv(gstore2 \ jro0), inv(gstore1), inv(groupblock(gndx0, lax, m0)), inv(gstore3 \ jro), log-cons(abs-log(nx1, gstore2 ↓), nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0)), new(ax0, nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0)), refsize-cons(gstore3, range ri[nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0)[referenced-adrs(lax.to-adr(n1), ri)].keys, ax0]), refsize-cons(gstore1, range fi1), refsize-cons(gstore2, range ri), ri-cons(ri, nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0)), ri-inj(fi1), ri-inj(ri), ri-inj(ri[nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0)[referenced-adrs(lax.to-adr(n1), ri)].keys, ax0]), n1 ∈ gstore2, n1 ∈ gstore1, pmaxino ≤ jmaxino, jmaxino ≤ jmaxino0, pmaxino ≤ jmaxino0, ri[nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0)[referenced-adrs(lax.to-adr(n1), ri)].keys, ax0].lebs ⊆ dom gstore3, range ri ⊆ dom nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0), fi1.lebs ⊆ dom gstore1, ri.lebs ⊆ dom gstore2, dom gstore2 ⊆ dom gstore3, ri.lebs ⊆ dom gstore3, ⌊err0⌋ , jvalid0 ∧ nx0 ≠ [] → valid-journal-head(nx0, gstore3, jro), jvalid3 ∧ nx1 ≠ [] → valid-journal-head(nx1, gstore2, jro0), jvalid5 → jvalid4 ⊦ #(ax0.toSet ∩ abs-log(nx1, gstore2 ↓).toSet) = 0, jmaxino = 0, jmaxino0 = 0, m0 = 0, pmaxino = 0, ax0.toSet ∩ abs-log(nx1, gstore2 ↓).toSet = ∅, dups(ax0), dups(nx0), dups(nx1), dups(nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0)[referenced-adrs(lax.to-adr(n1), ri)].keys), n1 ∈ jro0, n1 ∈ nx1, elems nx1 ⊆ dom gstore2 ↓

User applied rule insert rewrite lemma

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

spec: set-basic, inst: nat-set name: Subset seq: ⊦ ns ⊆ ns0 ↔ (∀ n. n ∈ ns → n ∈ ns0) subst: [ns0, ns] → [dom gstore2 ↓, elems nx1] flags: <all paths>

Additional information

Used simplifier rules: ⊦ n ∈ elems nx ↔ n ∈ nx; (s)% ⊦ n ∈ dom gstore ↔ n ∈ gstore; (s)% ⊦ n ∈ gstore ↓ ↔ n ∈ gstore; (s)%int-a: ⊦ (ns ∩ ns0) ∩ ns1 = ns ∩ ns0 ∩ ns1; from specification set-union[nat-set]%int-c: ⊦ ns ∩ ns0 = ns0 ∩ ns; from specification set-union[nat-set]%elems-in-notin-ginval: ⊦ n ∈ nx ∧ elems nx ∩ ns = ∅ → ¬ n ∈ ns; (forward) from specification apersistence-base%una: ⊦ (ns ∪ ns0) ∪ ns1 = ns ∪ ns0 ∪ ns1; from specification set-union[nat-set]%unc: ⊦ ns ∪ ns0 = ns0 ∪ ns; from specification set-union[nat-set]%fwd-in-log-in-gstore: ⊦ n ∈ nx ∧ ginval ∩ elems nx = ∅ ∧ dom gstore0 ∪ elems nx = dom gstore ∪ ginval → n ∈ gstore; (forward) from specification apersistence-base Used terms: dom gstore2 ↓, elems nx1