[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]

View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 40 from proof refine-get (previous step)

remove-refsize0(gstore1) = gstore1, elems nx ∩ jro0 = ∅, dom gstore1 ∪ elems nx = dom gstore2 ∪ jro0, jmaxino ≠ 0, pmaxino ≠ 0, jro1.keys.inodes?, p_os.keys.inodes?, jro1 < jmaxino, p_os < pmaxino, ri.inos < jmaxino, fi1.inos < pmaxino, inv(gstore2 \ jro0), inv(gstore1), log-cons(abs-log(nx, gstore2 ↓), nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0)), refsize-cons(gstore2, range ri), refsize-cons(gstore1, range fi1), ri-inj(ri), ri-inj(fi1), @(m, m0, m1) ∈ nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0), @(m, m0, m1) ∈ gstore2, pmaxino ≤ jmaxino, ri.lebs ⊆ dom gstore2, fi1.lebs ⊆ dom gstore1, ⌊err1⌋ , ¬ dups(nx), ¬ m ∈ jro0, jvalid2 → jvalid0, jvalid1 ∧ nx ≠ [] → valid-journal-head(nx, gstore2, jro0) ⊦ ∃ err0. ⌊err0⌋ ∧ ⟨err := err0⟩ ((jvalid2 → jvalid0) ∧ err1 = err)

User applied rule exists right

And obtained the following new goals

Proof step 41:
remove-refsize0(gstore1) = gstore1, elems nx ∩ jro0 = ∅, dom gstore1 ∪ elems nx = dom gstore2 ∪ jro0, p_os.keys.inodes?, jro1.keys.inodes?, fi1.inos < pmaxino, ri.inos < jmaxino, p_os < pmaxino, jro1 < jmaxino, inv(gstore1), inv(gstore2 \ jro0), log-cons(abs-log(nx, gstore2 ↓), nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0)), refsize-cons(gstore1, range fi1), refsize-cons(gstore2, range ri), ri-inj(fi1), ri-inj(ri), @(m, m0, m1) ∈ gstore2, @(m, m0, m1) ∈ nodes(gstore2 ↓, jro0), pmaxino ≤ jmaxino, fi1.lebs ⊆ dom gstore1, ri.lebs ⊆ dom gstore2, ⌊err1⌋ , jvalid1 ∧ nx ≠ [] → valid-journal-head(nx, gstore2, jro0), jvalid2 → jvalid0 ⊦ ⌊err1⌋ ∧ ⟨err := err1⟩ ((jvalid2 → jvalid0) ∧ err1 = err), jmaxino = 0, pmaxino = 0, dups(nx), m ∈ jro0

Rule argument

pos: right 1 terms: err1 abort: F discard: T computed: T

Additional information

Used terms: err1