[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]

View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 12 from proof refine-newino (previous step)

remove-refsize0(gstore0) = gstore0, elems nx ∩ jro0 = ∅, dom gstore0 ∪ elems nx = dom gstore ∪ jro0, p_os.keys.inodes?, jro.keys.inodes?, fi1.inos < pmaxino, ri.inos < jmaxino, p_os < pmaxino, jro < jmaxino, inv(gstore0), inv(gstore \ jro0), log-cons(abs-log(nx, gstore ↓), nodes(gstore ↓, jro0)), refsize-cons(gstore0, range fi1), refsize-cons(gstore, range ri), ri-inj(fi1), ri-inj(ri), jmaxino ∈ p_os, pmaxino ≤ jmaxino, fi1.lebs ⊆ dom gstore0, ri.lebs ⊆ dom gstore, jvalid1 ∧ nx ≠ [] → valid-journal-head(nx, gstore, jro0), jvalid → jvalid0 ⊦ jmaxino = 0, pmaxino = 0, dups(nx)

Heuristic simplifier applied rule simplifier

And obtained the following new goals

Proof step 13:
remove-refsize0(gstore0) = gstore0, elems nx ∩ jro0 = ∅, dom gstore0 ∪ elems nx = dom gstore ∪ jro0, p_os.keys.inodes?, jro.keys.inodes?, fi1.inos < pmaxino, ri.inos < jmaxino, p_os < pmaxino, jro < jmaxino, inv(gstore0), inv(gstore \ jro0), log-cons(abs-log(nx, gstore ↓), nodes(gstore ↓, jro0)), refsize-cons(gstore0, range fi1), refsize-cons(gstore, range ri), ri-inj(fi1), ri-inj(ri), jmaxino ∈ p_os, pmaxino ≤ jmaxino, fi1.lebs ⊆ dom gstore0, ri.lebs ⊆ dom gstore, jvalid1 ∧ nx ≠ [] → valid-journal-head(nx, gstore, jro0), jvalid → jvalid0 ⊦ # p_os = 0, jmaxino = 0, p_os = ∅, pmaxino = 0, dups(nx)

Rule argument

Additional information

Used simplifier rules: size-zero-01: ⊦ ns ≠ ∅ → # ns ≠ 0; (forward) from specification set-basic[nat-set]%ne-01: ⊦ n ∈ ns → ns ≠ ∅; (forward) from specification set-basic[nat-set]