[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]

View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 20 from proof crash-neutral-recovery (previous step)

fi1 = fi0, ginval0 = ginval2, ginval4 = ginval, gstore = gstore3, gstore0 = gstore4, gstore1 = crash(gstore4, gstore3, ginval, nx), maxino = maxino3, nx2 = nx, remove-refsize0(gstore3) = gstore3, elems nx ∩ ginval = ∅, dom gstore3 ∪ elems nx = dom gstore4 ∪ ginval, inv(gstore3), inv(gstore4 \ ginval), ri-inj(fi0), ri-inj(fi) ⊦ ⟨ginval := ?, syn := ?, gstore0 := ?, gstore := ?, nx := ?, maxino := ?, ginval0 := ?, maxino0 := ?, nx0 := ?, ginval1 := ?, fi := ?, fi0 := ?⟩ ( syn ∧ ginval4 = ginval ∧ gstore1 = crash(gstore0, gstore, ginval, nx) ∧ gstore3 = gstore ∧ nx2 = nx ∧ maxino3 = maxino ∧ ginval2 = ginval0 ∧ fi1 = fi0), dups(nx)

Heuristic symbolic execution applied rule assign right

And obtained the following new goals

Proof step 21:
fi1 = fi3, ginval4 = ginval3, ginval5 = ginval2, gstore1 = crash(gstore4, gstore3, ginval3, nx1), gstore2 = gstore4, gstore5 = gstore3, maxino1 = maxino3, nx2 = nx1, remove-refsize0(gstore3) = gstore3, elems nx1 ∩ ginval3 = ∅, dom gstore3 ∪ elems nx1 = dom gstore4 ∪ ginval3, inv(gstore4 \ ginval3), inv(gstore3), ri-inj(fi2), ri-inj(fi3) ⊦ dups(nx1), ∃ ginval, syn, gstore0, gstore, nx, maxino, ginval0, maxino0, nx0, ginval1, fi, fi0. syn ∧ ginval4 = ginval ∧ gstore1 = crash(gstore0, gstore, ginval, nx) ∧ gstore3 = gstore ∧ nx2 = nx ∧ maxino3 = maxino ∧ ginval2 = ginval0 ∧ fi1 = fi0

Proof step 20 from proof crash-neutral-recovery (previous step)

Heuristic symbolic execution applied rule assign right

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

Additional information