[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]

View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 26 from proof at-del (previous step)

str ∈ sdt, p0 ∈ sdt[str], str0 ∈ sdt[str, sdt[str] -- p0], q1 ∈ dnode(md, sdt[str, sdt[str] -- p0])[str0 '], ∀ tree, q. p0 ∈ tree ∧ ¬ p0 ⊑ q ∧ q ∈ tree → (tree -- p0)[q] = (q ⊑ p0 ⊃ tree[q] -- restn(# q, p0);tree[q]) ⊦ dnode(md, sdt[str, sdt[str] -- p0])[str0 '][q1] = (str0 ' + q1 ⊑ str ' + p0 ⊃ dnode(md, sdt)[str0 ' + q1] -- restn(# q1, p0);dnode(md, sdt)[str0 ' + q1]), p0 = ε

Heuristic cut applied rule cut formula

And obtained the following new goals

Proof step 27:
str0 = str, q1 ∈ dnode(md, sdt[str, sdt[str] -- p0])[str0 '], str0 ∈ sdt[str, sdt[str] -- p0], p0 ∈ sdt[str], str ∈ sdt, ∀ tree, q. p0 ∈ tree ∧ ¬ p0 ⊑ q ∧ q ∈ tree → (tree -- p0)[q] = (q ⊑ p0 ⊃ tree[q] -- restn(# q, p0);tree[q]) ⊦ dnode(md, sdt[str, sdt[str] -- p0])[str0 '][q1] = (str0 ' + q1 ⊑ str ' + p0 ⊃ dnode(md, sdt)[str0 ' + q1] -- restn(# q1, p0);dnode(md, sdt)[str0 ' + q1]), p0 = ε
Proof step 32:
str ∈ sdt ⊦ dnode(md, sdt)[str '] = sdt[str]
Proof step 33:
⊦ str ∈ sdt → dnode(md, sdt)[str ' + p] = sdt[str][p]

Rule argument

fma: str0 = str

Additional information

Used simplifier rules: one-at: str ∈ sdt ⊦ dnode(md, sdt)[str '] = sdt[str];%at-dnode: ⊦ str ∈ sdt → dnode(md, sdt)[str ' + p] = sdt[str][p];% ⊦ str ∈ sdt[str0, tree] ↔ str = str0 ∨ str ∈ sdt; (ws)% ⊦ str ≠ str0 → (str ∈ sdt[str0, tree] ↔ str ∈ sdt); (s)% ⊦ str ≠ str0 → sdt[str0, tree][str] = sdt[str]; (s)%a: ⊦ (p + p0) + p1 = p + p0 + p1; from specification list[path]% ⊦ str ' + p ⊑ str0 ' + p0 ↔ str = str0 ∧ p ⊑ p0; (ws) Used formulas: str0 = str