[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]

View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 4 from proof delta-write-same (previous step)

⊦ sum-of-differences(ecs(wlar[n, wl-entry(wlar[n].ec, stat)]).max, ecs(wlar[n, wl-entry(wlar[n].ec, stat)])) = sum-of-differences(ecs(wlar).max, ecs(wlar))

Heuristic nonsplitting cut applied rule cut formula

And obtained the following new goals

Proof step 5:
n < # wlar ⊦ sum-of-differences(ecs(wlar[n, wl-entry(wlar[n].ec, stat)]).max, ecs(wlar[n, wl-entry(wlar[n].ec, stat)])) = sum-of-differences(ecs(wlar).max, ecs(wlar))
Proof step 7:
⊦ sum-of-differences(ecs(wlar[n, wl-entry(wlar[n].ec, stat)]).max, ecs(wlar[n, wl-entry(wlar[n].ec, stat)])) = sum-of-differences(ecs(wlar).max, ecs(wlar)), n < # wlar

Rule argument

fma: n < # wlar

Additional information

Used formulas: n < # wlar