[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]

View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 20 from proof initialization (previous step)

isdir ↔ isdir0, ino = LEB_SIZE ⊦ ∃ root, fs, ofh, psynced. ⟨choose err with ⌊err⌋ in err0 := err⟩ (ofh = ∅ ∧ fs = ∅ ∧ abs(root, ROOT_INO)((∅ ++ ROOT_INO)[ROOT_INO, mkdir(0, md, 0, 0, ∅)]) ∧ ESUCCESS = err0), ⟨root0 := dnode(md, ∅), fs0 := ∅, ofh0 := ∅, psynced0 := true, err0 := ESUCCESS⟩ (ofh0 = ∅ ∧ fs0 = ∅ ∧ abs(root0, ROOT_INO)((∅ ++ ROOT_INO)[ROOT_INO, mkdir(0, md, 0, 0, ∅)]) ∧ ESUCCESS = err0)

Heuristic symbolic execution applied rule assign right

And obtained the following new goals

Proof step 21:
isdir ↔ isdir0, ino = LEB_SIZE ⊦ ∃ root, fs, ofh, psynced. ⟨choose err with ⌊err⌋ in err0 := err⟩ (ofh = ∅ ∧ fs = ∅ ∧ abs(root, ROOT_INO)((∅ ++ ROOT_INO)[ROOT_INO, mkdir(0, md, 0, 0, ∅)]) ∧ ESUCCESS = err0), ∅ = ∅ ∧ ∅ = ∅ ∧ abs(dnode(md, ∅), ROOT_INO)((∅ ++ ROOT_INO)[ROOT_INO, mkdir(0, md, 0, 0, ∅)]) ∧ ESUCCESS = ESUCCESS

Rule argument

pos: right 2

Proof step 20 from proof initialization (previous step)

Heuristic symbolic execution applied rule assign right

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

Additional information