[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]

View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 90 from proof refine-readdir (previous step)

dirs[ino1] = mkdir(# entries, md, # links(ino1, dirs), m1, entries), root[path] = dnode(md0, sdt), root.dir?, dom of < ino0, abs(root, ROOT_INO)(dirs), afs-cons(dirs, files), fids-cons(root, abs-files(files), abs-of(of)), ispath(path, ROOT_INO, ino1, dirs, files), of-cons(of, dirs, files), pr(user, md), px-parent(user, path, ROOT_INO, dirs, files), ino1 ∈ dirs, psynced → asynced ⊦ dom entries = dom sdt

User applied rule insert rewrite lemma

And obtained the following new goals

Proof step 91:
⊦ p ∈ tree → abs(tree, ino0) = _∃(λ ino1. abs|(tree, ino0, p, ino1) * abs(tree[p], ino1))
Proof step 92:
⊦ abs(tree, ino)(dirs) ∧ fids-cons(tree, abs-files(files), ofh) ∧ afs-cons(dirs, files) → (p ∈ tree ↔ ispath(p, ino, dirs, files))
Proof step 93:
root[path] = dnode(md0, sdt), dirs[ino1] = mkdir(# entries, md, # links(ino1, dirs), m1, entries), root.dir?, dom of < ino0, (_∃(λ ino1. abs|(root, ROOT_INO, path, ino1) * abs(root[path], ino1)))(dirs), afs-cons(dirs, files), fids-cons(root, abs-files(files), abs-of(of)), ispath(path, ROOT_INO, ino1, dirs, files), of-cons(of, dirs, files), pr(user, md), px-parent(user, path, ROOT_INO, dirs, files), ino1 ∈ dirs, path ∈ root, psynced → asynced ⊦ dom entries = dom sdt

Rule argument

spec: vfs-abs name: path-unfold seq: ⊦ p ∈ tree → abs(tree, ino0) = _∃(λ ino1. abs|(tree, ino0, p, ino1) * abs(tree[p], ino1)) subst: [p, ino0, tree] → [path, ROOT_INO, root] flags: <all paths>

Additional information

Used simplifier rules: path-in-eq: ⊦ abs(tree, ino)(dirs) ∧ fids-cons(tree, abs-files(files), ofh) ∧ afs-cons(dirs, files) → (p ∈ tree ↔ ispath(p, ino, dirs, files));% ⊦ ispath(p, n, m, dirs, files) → ispath(p, n, dirs, files); (s) Used terms: path, ROOT_INO, root