Proof step 693 from proof refine-unlink (previous step)

User applied rule case distinction

And obtained the following new goals

• Proof step 694:

  dirs[ino1] = mkdir(# entries, md, # links(ino1, dirs), m1, entries), fs = abs-files(files), root[q].dir?, root.dir?, dom of < ino0, abs(root, ROOT_INO)(dirs), afs-cons(dirs, files), fids-cons(root, abs-files(files), abs-of(of)), ispath(q, ROOT_INO, ino1, dirs, files), of-cons(of, dirs, files), pw(user, md), px(user, md), px-parent(user, q, ROOT_INO, dirs, files), ino1 ∈ dirs, psynced → asynced, links(ino1, dirs) ≠ ∅ ∨ ino1 = ROOT_INO ⊦ pre-unlink(q + str ', ENOENT, user, root, fs, abs-of(of)), str ∈ entries

• Proof step 697:

  dirs[ino1] = mkdir(# entries, md, # links(ino1, dirs), m1, entries), fs = abs-files(files), root[q].dir?, root.dir?, dom of < ino0, abs(root, ROOT_INO)(dirs), afs-cons(dirs, files), fids-cons(root, abs-files(files), abs-of(of)), ispath(q, ROOT_INO, ino1, dirs, files), of-cons(of, dirs, files), pw(user, md), px(user, md), px-parent(user, q, ROOT_INO, dirs, files), ino1 ∈ dirs, psynced → asynced, links(ino1, dirs) ≠ ∅ ∨ ino1 = ROOT_INO ⊦ ⟨err0 := ENOENT; if err0 = ESUCCESS then let fid = root[q + str '].fid in {root := root -- (q + str '); if ¬ fid ∈ abs-of(of).fids ∧ ¬ fid ∈ root.fids then fs := fs -- fid}; psynced := ?⟩ (fs = abs-files(files) ∧ abs(root, ROOT_INO)(dirs) ∧ (psynced → asynced) ∧ ENOENT = err0), str ∈ entries

Rule argument

Additional information