[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]

View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 209 from proof refine-writemeta (previous step)

root[path].dir? ↔ ino1 ∈ dirs, err = err1, err1 = ESUCCESS, ino = ino1, root.dir?, dom of < ino0, abs(root, ROOT_INO)(dirs), afs-cons(dirs, files), fids-cons(root, abs-files(files), abs-of(of)), ispath(path, ROOT_INO, ino1, dirs, files), of-cons(of, dirs, files), px-parent(user, path, ROOT_INO, dirs, files), psynced → asynced ⊦ ⟪abort; fs := abs-files(files); err1 := err; if err1 = ESUCCESS then if pw(user, inode.meta) then {inode.meta := md; afs_check_commit#(dirs, files; err1; asynced); if err1 = ESUCCESS then afs_write_inode#(inode; err1, dirs, files; asynced)} else err1 := EACCESS⟫ ⟨posix_writemeta#(path, md, user, abs-of(of); err0, root, fs; psynced)⟩ (fs = abs-files(files) ∧ abs(root, ROOT_INO)(dirs) ∧ (psynced → asynced) ∧ err1 = err0), pre-iget(ino, dirs, files)

Heuristic symbolic execution applied rule abort right

And obtained the following new goals

Proof step 210:
root[path].dir? ↔ ino1 ∈ dirs, err = err1, err1 = ESUCCESS, ino = ino1, root.dir?, dom of < ino0, abs(root, ROOT_INO)(dirs), afs-cons(dirs, files), fids-cons(root, abs-files(files), abs-of(of)), ispath(path, ROOT_INO, ino1, dirs, files), of-cons(of, dirs, files), px-parent(user, path, ROOT_INO, dirs, files), psynced → asynced ⊦ pre-iget(ino, dirs, files)

Proof step 209 from proof refine-writemeta (previous step)

Heuristic symbolic execution applied rule abort right

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

Additional information